About Me

Name: John Barnhart
Email: barnhart@barnhartblog.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

"Just Say No!" to the Bailout John McCain!

Before reading this, I want it understood, this is not the official position of www.letsgetthisright.com or anyone else, this is MY PERSONAL OPINION and does not represent my position as a staffer of www.letsgetthisright.com

 

American's need to stand up and tell John McCain to "Just Say No!"

 

If one reads just the title of the bill that was voted down yesterday it has absolutely nothing to do with the government’s attempted bail out to the tune of $700 Billion dollars. For those who are unaware here is the title of the "bailout bill"

 

BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes 

 

(what the hell... how can anyone make heads or tails of that title referencing a bailout bill???)

 

No American should be in favor of this bail out - you don't fix a temporary problem within a capitalist economy with a permanent socialist solution. Hell, even 95 democrats agreed yesterday that the bailout is the WRONG solution.

 

This is one of those occasions where I DO NOT support the President’s position!

 

President Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Rahm Emanuel,  John Murtha, Charlie Rangel, and a host of other liberals are in favor of this ridiculous bill, the Republicans who supported it should be ashamed and do not represent true conservative values.

 

In my own personal opinion, if John McCain wants to have any hope of winning the White House and thereby help Sarah Palin as a potential future President, he should immediately separate his position from that of the President, Secretary Paulson, Senator Obama, as well as the Democrats and Republicans who support the bailout.

 

I like McCain, I like Palin and they are the ticket I am supporting, but the folks at the top of the campaign who are giving them advice need to hush, stop pushing a bad agenda, and listen to the voice of the American people on this one and let John McCain and Sarah Palin act accordingly.

 

Let us, "We The People" figure out how to get this right, by allowing us to participate in the general economy to fix it over time, the bailout bill is the equivalent of using morphine to cure a bad flu bug, the cure is not only the wrong prescription, it is more deadly than the illness itself.

 

John McCain needs to be the Maverick that many Americans like, respect and are comfortable voting for.

 

Senator John McCain should immediately come out and "Just Say No" to the bail out and suggest the following or something very similar to it;

 

 

1. Suspend the Mark-to-Market Rule - If short selling can be suspended on 799 stocks (an arbitrary number and a warning of the rule by bureaucrats which is coming under the Paulson plan), the mark-to-market rule can be suspended for six months and then replaced with a more accurate three year rolling average mark-to-market.


 

2. Repeal Sarbanes Oxley - It failed with Freddy Mac. It failed with Fannie Mae. It failed with Bear Stearns. It failed with Lehman Brothers. It failed with AIG. It is crippling our entrepreneurial economy. I spent three days this week in Silicon Valley. Everyone agreed Sarbanes-Oxley was crippling the economy. One firm told me they would bring more than 20 companies public in the next year if the law was repealed. Its Sarbanes-Oxley’s $3 million per startup annual accounting fee that is keeping these companies private.

3. Match our competitors in China and Singapore by going to a zero capital gains tax - Private capital will flood into Wall Street with zero capital gains and it will come at no cost to the taxpayer. Even if you believe in a static analytical model in which lower capital gains taxes mean lower revenues for the Treasury, a zero capital gains tax costs much less than the Paulson plan. And if you believe in a historic model (as I do), a zero capital gains tax would lead to a dramatic increase in federal revenue through a larger, more competitive and more prosperous economy.

4. Immediately pass an “all of the above” energy plan - that is designed to bring home $500 billion of the $700 billion a year we are sending overseas. With that much energy income the American economy would boom and government revenues would grow.

 

5. Immediately DEMAND investigations - of those responsible for directly influencing the current economic situation due to either direct action or inaction, be they captains of industry, lobbyists or politicians and as McCain would say "make them famous" and let the FBI, the Justice Dept. and the Federal Court systems follow up from there.

 

None of these suggestions are new, they are supported by Conservative politicians and business men like New Gingrich (who actually made those proposals on Sept. 21st - See Forbes Magazine and National Review Online from that date) and there are also plenty of "hip and trendy" socially left "pop culture icons" like Donald Trump who favor the concept of "Just Say No" as well.

 

There is NO REASON for John McCain to support a bailout bill that both George Bush and Barack Obama support and 83% to 86% of Americans on both sides DO NOT support!

 

John McCain MUST be on the RIGHT side of history on this bill, I say call and email the McCain campaign, and his Senate offices and tell them to tell John McCain to "Just Say No!" 

 

John McCain Campaign Office

(703) 418-2008 or http://www.johnmccain.com/Contact/

Senatorial Offices

·         Phoenix Office:

5353 North 16th Street
Suite 105
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Main: 602-952-2410
Fax: 602-952-8702

·         Tempe Office:

4703 South Lakeshore Drive
Suite 1
Tempe, AZ 85282
Main: 480-897-6289
Fax: 480-897-8389

·         Tucson Office:

407 West Congress Street
Suite 103
Tucson, AZ 85701
Main: 520-670-6334
Fax: 520-670-6637

·         Washington Office:

241 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Main: 202-224-2235
Fax: 202-228-2862

Below is the result of the roll call vote from yesterday.

H R 3997 RECORDED VOTE 29-Sep-2008 2:07 PM       

BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes

AYES Democrat 140

Republican 65    

NOES Democrat 95

Republican 133    

NOT VOTING Republican 1   (Shame on you Congressman Weller!)

TOTALS AYES 205 NOES 228      QUESTION: On Concurring in Senate Amendment With An Amendment

Ackerman D NY legislator Aye
Allen D ME legislator Aye
Andrews D NJ legislator Aye
Arcuri D NY legislator Aye
Baird D WA legislator Aye
Baldwin D WI legislator Aye
Bean D IL legislator Aye
Berman D CA legislator Aye
Berry D AR legislator Aye
Bishop (GA) D GA legislator Aye
Bishop (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Boren D OK legislator Aye
Boswell D IA legislator Aye
Boucher D VA legislator Aye
Boyd (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Brady (PA) D PA legislator Aye
Brown, Corrine D FL legislator Aye
Capps D CA legislator Aye
Capuano D MA legislator Aye
Cardoza D CA legislator Aye
Carnahan D MO legislator Aye
Clarke D NY legislator Aye
Clyburn D SC legislator Aye
Cohen D TN legislator Aye
Cooper D TN legislator Aye
Costa D CA legislator Aye
Cramer D AL legislator Aye
Crowley D NY legislator Aye
Davis (AL) D AL legislator Aye
Davis (CA) D CA legislator Aye
Davis (IL) D IL legislator Aye
DeGette D CO legislator Aye
DeLauro D CT legislator Aye
Dicks D WA legislator Aye
Dingell D MI legislator Aye
Donnelly D IN legislator Aye
Doyle D PA legislator Aye
Edwards (TX) D TX legislator Aye
Ellison D MN legislator Aye
Ellsworth D IN legislator Aye
Emanuel D IL legislator Aye
Engel D NY legislator Aye
Eshoo D CA legislator Aye
Etheridge D NC legislator Aye
Farr D CA legislator Aye
Fattah D PA legislator Aye
Foster D IL legislator Aye
Frank (MA) D MA legislator Aye
Gonzalez D TX legislator Aye
Gordon D TN legislator Aye
Gutierrez D IL legislator Aye
Hall (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Hare D IL legislator Aye
Harman D CA legislator Aye
Hastings (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Higgins D NY legislator Aye
Hinojosa D TX legislator Aye
Holt D NJ legislator Aye
Honda D CA legislator Aye
Hooley D OR legislator Aye
Hoyer D MD legislator Aye
Israel D NY legislator Aye
Johnson, E. B. D TX legislator Aye
Kanjorski D PA legislator Aye
Kennedy D RI legislator Aye
Kildee D MI legislator Aye
Kind D WI legislator Aye
Klein (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Langevin D RI legislator Aye
Larsen (WA) D WA legislator Aye
Larson (CT) D CT legislator Aye
Levin D MI legislator Aye
Loebsack D IA legislator Aye
Lofgren, Zoe D CA legislator Aye
Lowey D NY legislator Aye
Mahoney (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Maloney (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Markey D MA legislator Aye
Marshall D GA legislator Aye
Matsui D CA legislator Aye
McCarthy (NY) D NY legislator Aye
McCollum (MN) D MN legislator Aye
McDermott D WA legislator Aye
McGovern D MA legislator Aye
McNerney D CA legislator Aye
McNulty D NY legislator Aye
Meek (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Meeks (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Melancon D LA legislator Aye
Miller (NC) D NC legislator Aye
Miller, George D CA legislator Aye
Mollohan D WV legislator Aye
Moore (KS) D KS legislator Aye
Moore (WI) D WI legislator Aye
Moran (VA) D VA legislator Aye
Murphy (CT) D CT legislator Aye
Murphy, Patrick D PA legislator Aye
Murtha D PA legislator Aye
Nadler D NY legislator Aye
Neal (MA) D MA legislator Aye
Oberstar D MN legislator Aye
Obey D WI legislator Aye
Olver D MA legislator Aye
Pallone D NJ legislator Aye
Pelosi D CA speaker Aye
Perlmutter D CO legislator Aye
Pomeroy D ND legislator Aye
Price (NC) D NC legislator Aye
Rahall D WV legislator Aye
Rangel D NY legislator Aye
Reyes D TX legislator Aye
Richardson D CA legislator Aye
Ross D AR legislator Aye
Ruppersberger D MD legislator Aye
Ryan (OH) D OH legislator Aye
Sarbanes D MD legislator Aye
Schakowsky D IL legislator Aye
Schwartz D PA legislator Aye
Sestak D PA legislator Aye
Sires D NJ legislator Aye
Skelton D MO legislator Aye
Slaughter D NY legislator Aye
Smith (WA) D WA legislator Aye
Snyder D AR legislator Aye
Space D OH legislator Aye
Speier D CA legislator Aye
Spratt D SC legislator Aye
Tanner D TN legislator Aye
Tauscher D CA legislator Aye
Towns D NY legislator Aye
Tsongas D MA legislator Aye
Van Hollen D MD legislator Aye
Velazquez D NY legislator Aye
Wasserman Schultz D FL legislator Aye
Waters D CA legislator Aye
Watt D NC legislator Aye
Waxman D CA legislator Aye
Weiner D NY legislator Aye
Wexler D FL legislator Aye
Wilson (OH) D OH legislator Aye
Bachus R AL legislator Aye
Blunt R MO legislator Aye
Boehner R OH legislator Aye
Bonner R AL legislator Aye
Bono Mack R CA legislator Aye
Boozman R AR legislator Aye
Brady (TX) R TX legislator Aye
Brown (SC) R SC legislator Aye
Calvert R CA legislator Aye
Camp (MI) R MI legislator Aye
Campbell (CA) R CA legislator Aye
Cannon R UT legislator Aye
Cantor R VA legislator Aye
Castle R DE legislator Aye
Cole (OK) R OK legislator Aye
Crenshaw R FL legislator Aye
Cubin R WY legislator Aye
Davis, Tom R VA legislator Aye
Dreier R CA legislator Aye
Ehlers R MI legislator Aye
Emerson R MO legislator Aye
Everett R AL legislator Aye
Ferguson R NJ legislator Aye
Fossella R NY legislator Aye
Gilchrest R MD legislator Aye
Granger R TX legislator Aye
Herger R CA legislator Aye
Hobson R OH legislator Aye
Inglis (SC) R SC legislator Aye
King (NY) R NY legislator Aye
Kirk R IL legislator Aye
Kline (MN) R MN legislator Aye
LaHood R IL legislator Aye
Lewis (CA) R CA legislator Aye
Lewis (KY) R KY legislator Aye
Lungren, Daniel E. R CA legislator Aye
McCrery R LA legislator Aye
McHugh R NY legislator Aye
McKeon R CA legislator Aye
Miller, Gary R CA legislator Aye
Peterson (PA) R PA legislator Aye
Pickering R MS legislator Aye
Porter R NV legislator Aye
Pryce (OH) R OH legislator Aye
Putnam R FL legislator Aye
Radanovich R CA legislator Aye
Regula R OH legislator Aye
Reynolds R NY legislator Aye
Rogers (AL) R AL legislator Aye
Rogers (KY) R KY legislator Aye
Ryan (WI) R WI legislator Aye
Saxton R NJ legislator Aye
Sessions R TX legislator Aye
Shays R CT legislator Aye
Simpson R ID legislator Aye
Smith (TX) R TX legislator Aye
Souder R IN legislator Aye
Tancredo R CO legislator Aye
Upton R MI legislator Aye
Walden (OR) R OR legislator Aye
Walsh (NY) R NY legislator Aye
Weldon (FL) R FL legislator Aye
Wilson (NM) R NM legislator Aye
Wilson (SC) R SC legislator Aye
Wolf R VA legislator Aye
Abercrombie D HI legislator No
Altmire D PA legislator No
Baca D CA legislator No
Barrow D GA legislator No
Becerra D CA legislator No
Berkley D NV legislator No
Blumenauer D OR legislator No
Boyda (KS) D KS legislator No
Braley (IA) D IA legislator No
Butterfield D NC legislator No
Carney D PA legislator No
Carson D IN legislator No
Castor D FL legislator No
Cazayoux D LA legislator No
Chandler D KY legislator No
Childers D MS legislator No
Clay D MO legislator No
Cleaver D MO legislator No
Conyers D MI legislator No
Costello D IL legislator No
Courtney D CT legislator No
Cuellar D TX legislator No
Cummings D MD legislator No
Davis, Lincoln D TN legislator No
DeFazio D OR legislator No
Delahunt D MA legislator No
Doggett D TX legislator No
Edwards (MD) D MD legislator No
Filner D CA legislator No
Giffords D AZ legislator No
Gillibrand D NY legislator No
Green, Al D TX legislator No
Green, Gene D TX legislator No
Grijalva D AZ legislator No
Herseth Sandlin D SD legislator No
Hill D IN legislator No
Hinchey D NY legislator No
Hirono D HI legislator No
Hodes D NH legislator No
Holden D PA legislator No
Inslee D WA legislator No
Jackson (IL) D IL legislator No
Jackson-Lee (TX) D TX legislator No
Jefferson D LA legislator No
Johnson (GA) D GA legislator No
Kagen D WI legislator No
Kaptur D OH legislator No
Kilpatrick D MI legislator No
Kucinich D OH legislator No
Lampson D TX legislator No
Lee D CA legislator No
Lewis (GA) D GA legislator No
Lipinski D IL legislator No
Lynch D MA legislator No
Matheson D UT legislator No
McIntyre D NC legislator No
Michaud D ME legislator No
Mitchell D AZ legislator No
Napolitano D CA legislator No
Ortiz D TX legislator No
Pascrell D NJ legislator No
Pastor D AZ legislator No
Payne D NJ legislator No
Peterson (MN) D MN legislator No
Rodriguez D TX legislator No
Rothman D NJ legislator No
Roybal-Allard D CA legislator No
Rush D IL legislator No
Salazar D CO legislator No
Sanchez, Linda T. D CA legislator No
Sanchez, Loretta D CA legislator No
Schiff D CA legislator No
Scott (GA) D GA legislator No
Scott (VA) D VA legislator No
Serrano D NY legislator No
Shea-Porter D NH legislator No
Sherman D CA legislator No
Shuler D NC legislator No
Solis D CA legislator No
Stark D CA legislator No
Stupak D MI legislator No
Sutton D OH legislator No
Taylor D MS legislator No
Thompson (CA) D CA legislator No
Thompson (MS) D MS legislator No
Tierney D MA legislator No
Udall (CO) D CO legislator No
Udall (NM) D NM legislator No
Visclosky D IN legislator No
Walz (MN) D MN legislator No
Watson D CA legislator No
Welch (VT) D VT legislator No
Woolsey D CA legislator No
Wu D OR legislator No
Yarmuth D KY legislator No
Aderholt R AL legislator No
Akin R MO legislator No
Alexander R LA legislator No
Bachmann R MN legislator No
Barrett (SC) R SC legislator No
Bartlett (MD) R MD legislator No
Barton (TX) R TX legislator No
Biggert R IL legislator No
Bilbray R CA legislator No
Bilirakis R FL legislator No
Bishop (UT) R UT legislator No
Blackburn R TN legislator No
Boustany R LA legislator No
Broun (GA) R GA legislator No
Brown-Waite, Ginny R FL legislator No
Buchanan R FL legislator No
Burgess R TX legislator No
Burton (IN) R IN legislator No
Buyer R IN legislator No
Capito R WV legislator No
Carter R TX legislator No
Chabot R OH legislator No
Coble R NC legislator No
Conaway R TX legislator No
Culberson R TX legislator No
Davis (KY) R KY legislator No
Davis, David R TN legislator No
Deal (GA) R GA legislator No
Dent R PA legislator No
Diaz-Balart, L. R FL legislator No
Diaz-Balart, M. R FL legislator No
Doolittle R CA legislator No
Drake R VA legislator No
Duncan R TN legislator No
English (PA) R PA legislator No
Fallin R OK legislator No
Feeney R FL legislator No
Flake R AZ legislator No
Forbes R VA legislator No
Fortenberry R NE legislator No
Foxx R NC legislator No
Franks (AZ) R AZ legislator No
Frelinghuysen R NJ legislator No
Gallegly R CA legislator No
Garrett (NJ) R NJ legislator No
Gerlach R PA legislator No
Gingrey R GA legislator No
Gohmert R TX legislator No
Goode R VA legislator No
Goodlatte R VA legislator No
Graves R MO legislator No
Hall (TX) R TX legislator No
Hastings (WA) R WA legislator No
Hayes R NC legislator No
Heller R NV legislator No
Hensarling R TX legislator No
Hoekstra R MI legislator No
Hulshof R MO legislator No
Hunter R CA legislator No
Issa R CA legislator No
Johnson (IL) R IL legislator No
Johnson, Sam R TX legislator No
Jones (NC) R NC legislator No
Jordan R OH legislator No
Keller R FL legislator No
King (IA) R IA legislator No
Kingston R GA legislator No
Knollenberg R MI legislator No
Kuhl (NY) R NY legislator No
Lamborn R CO legislator No
Latham R IA legislator No
LaTourette R OH legislator No
Latta R OH legislator No
Linder R GA legislator No
LoBiondo R NJ legislator No
Lucas R OK legislator No
Mack R FL legislator No
Manzullo R IL legislator No
Marchant R TX legislator No
McCarthy (CA) R CA legislator No
McCaul (TX) R TX legislator No
McCotter R MI legislator No
McHenry R NC legislator No
McMorris Rodgers R WA legislator No
Mica R FL legislator No
Miller (FL) R FL legislator No
Miller (MI) R MI legislator No
Moran (KS) R KS legislator No
Murphy, Tim R PA legislator No
Musgrave R CO legislator No
Myrick R NC legislator No
Neugebauer R TX legislator No
Nunes R CA legislator No
Paul R TX legislator No
Pearce R NM legislator No
Pence R IN legislator No
Petri R WI legislator No
Pitts R PA legislator No
Platts R PA legislator No
Poe R TX legislator No
Price (GA) R GA legislator No
Ramstad R MN legislator No
Rehberg R MT legislator No
Reichert R WA legislator No
Renzi R AZ legislator No
Rogers (MI) R MI legislator No
Rohrabacher R CA legislator No
Ros-Lehtinen R FL legislator No
Roskam R IL legislator No
Royce R CA legislator No
Sali R ID legislator No
Scalise R LA legislator No
Schmidt R OH legislator No
Sensenbrenner R WI legislator No
Shadegg R AZ legislator No
Shimkus R IL legislator No
Shuster R PA legislator No
Smith (NE) R NE legislator No
Smith (NJ) R NJ legislator No
Stearns R FL legislator No
Sullivan R OK legislator No
Terry R NE legislator No
Thornberry R TX legislator No
Tiahrt R KS legislator No
Tiberi R OH legislator No
Turner R OH legislator No
Walberg R MI legislator No
Wamp R TN legislator No
Westmoreland R GA legislator No
Whitfield (KY) R KY legislator No
Wittman (VA) R VA legislator No
Young (AK) R AK legislator No
Young (FL) R FL legislator No
Weller R IL legislator Not Voting

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Mainstream Media; Give Credit Where Credit Is Due

 

The_fall_of_manSince the fall of man, life for all of us changed and I for one don't believe we should look at life through rose colored glasses, it just is not reality. As many joys as life offers it also at times presents us all with frustrating  opportunities and I believe that there is a higher reason for it. Through all of it we after forget ourselves in an attempt to recognize comedy in tragedy, sometimes during the tragedy itself but usually well after the danger and disastrous impact has passed.

Two days ago I wrote a Blog entitled "What Is Wrong With People Today?", it was about how openly indecent we have started to become when discussing the misfortune of others, and how we seem to have lost the spirit we all shared after the tragedy of 9/11.

(See link here) http://www.barnhartblog.com/barnhart_blog/2008/09/what-is-wrong-w.html

In the blog I recalled how one of the Austin, Texas morning radio shows, "JB & Sandy" had made light of a comment they had heard after hurricane Ike had hit the gulf coast. The comment was made by a man who saw comical irony in the tragedy of how his ex-wife's home had become flooded during the storm without much thought to her welfare or the impact it would have on her life.

It was because of this comical irony that the subject was brought up for all to hear and the staff giggled about it on air. In addition, I pointed out how the on air crew kept flippantly directing people to their website for more information as to how they could contact the Red Cross to donate to disaster relief for hurricane Ike. The problem was that when I went to the radio stations website, the link was seemingly buried under other advertising and links. To me the morning shows disregard for the victims of hurricane Ike was tacky. There was a better way to address the story of the ex-husband laughing about his ex-wife's misfortune.

IkeI can't explain why I, they or anyone else sometimes forget who we are on the inside and suddenly lose our compassionate thought for one another. Maybe it’s because we are suffering from information overload and traveling at warp speed so often in our daily lives that we forget our manners when we shouldn't. We miss opportunities to tell our family and friends how much we love them, we forget to give our pets attention, we stop smiling to people who pass us by at work or on the street and we even forget to say “please” and “thank you” as a common courtesy. Regardless, I do want to give credit where credit is due.

Jb_sandyThis morning I heard the same folks on the same show perform a really great public service announcement about the Capitol Area Food Bank here in Austin. The food bank has teamed with other local media outlets, H.E.B. grocery stores and others to organize a hurricane Ike food drive. In making the announcement the "JB & Sandy" morning show on MIX 94.7 did exactly what one would expect from a radio station PSA; they announced when, where and how people could help, they gave phone numbers, drop off locations, etc. The entire tone of the announcement and resulting brief conversation was on the mark. It reminded me of some of the great things that the folks at Mix 94.7 and others in the media do for our communities, especially during the holidays; they announce and encourage participation in “Turkey Trots”, blood drives, bike drives, Toys for Tots, Blue Santa, Brown Santa, Angel Trees, Special Olympics, the list goes on and on.

911 So, despite my blog the other day, and despite my normal distrust and dislike for the "drive-by media" there are some good folks out there, usually in our local radio, print and TV media and some who are on the national stage. It is worth remembering that at least some have covered everthing from Ike to Katrina, 9/11, and other news stories with honesty and integrity.

Just remember, as listeners it’s our job to help bring them back in line when they neglect or forget to treat their responsibility and the public trust with the respect it deserves. Likewise, it’s their job to help remind us of other people’s needs, our human frailty and even provide some us some much needed laughter each day.

Call it good will toward men, natural compassion, human kindness, the spirit of Christmas or the “after 9/11 experience”, there is a unique link that bind us all, it is an undeniable eternal bond. Because of it, the new media, (bloggers, pod casters, Internet radio hosts), along with the general public and the mainstream media will find times when we can, do, and should work hand in hand.

Should you want to donate to hurricane Ike, Gustav or Dolly disaster relief efforts, these links will get you to organizations that will appreciate your help.

http://www.directrelief.org/EmergencyResponse/2008/HurricaneIke/HurricaneIke.aspx?linkidentifier=id&itemid=3774

http://www.redcross.org/article/0,1072,0_312_8151,00.html

http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/www_usn_2.nsf/vw-text-dynamic-arrays/7ACF92F21144E396852574B400463B55?openDocument Donations also may be mailed to:

Office of the Governor Texas Disaster Relief Fund

P.O. Box 12878

Austin, TX 78711-2878

When I wrote my blog the other day I was very hopeful that they would soon "rebound" from what I thought was a poorly chosen way to discuss hurricane Ike so I did nothing to encourage anyone to call or write them with any outrage. My wife and I listen to them enough to know that they have had their better moments, today is just another example of their true nature.

If you would like to send a kind note to JB & Sandy at Mix 94.7, read more about them, or thank them for what they do in the Austin, TX area they can be reached here.

CALL 390-5947 OR 800-578-9947

Email Us - mornings@jbandsandy.com

For more information about the JB & Sandy Morning Show,visit www.jbandsandy.com

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

9/11 My Exclusive Interview with Retired CIA Agent Michael Scheuer, The Osama bin Laden Task Force Leader

 

Michael_scheuer First, many thanks to former CIA Agent and head of the bin Laden task force, Michael Scheuer, for granting me an exclusive interview with him on the 7th anniversary of 9/11; especially since prior to the interview Michael had just completed a very full day of teaching two courses at a secure location, if he was exhausted, tired or drained in any way he indicated no signs of it on air.

He was, is, and always will be a very busy man, and the fact that he continues to teach, write, advise, and help others try and understand Islamic Jihad, its motivating factors, its leaders and how best to combat them is a testament to his patriotism.

Michael Scheuer was an outstanding, enthusiastic, and extremely informative guest. For those who did not have the opportunity to hear the interview, PLEASE listen to it in the archives on this website (see the far right column) of www.barnhartblog.com or by going to http://www.blogtalkradio.com/headingright/barnhartblog

Thanks to my loyal listeners, Blog readers and the new folks who visited the broadcast last night; the audience was more than double its normal size which I greatly appreciate.

Michael Scheuer's responses to the questions asked of him completely dispute the claims made by former President Bill Clinton, former Fist Lady now Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton,  former National Security Adviser Samuel Richard "Sandy" Berger, and Richard "Dick" Clarke the Chief Counter-terrorism Adviser to the National Security Council.

Michael Scheuer revealed that the actual number of opportunities to capture or kill Osama bin Laden priot 9/11 were many more than anyone has ever previously publicized, and he detailed the reasons for some of the worst decisions made by the Clinton White House and the tragic mistake made by CENTCOM (Central Command) under President Bush at Tora Bora. 

Osamabinladen1998thumb Here are just some of the highlights of what we discussed...

Was 9/11 an inside job?

How many times did the Clinton administration "drop the ball" and decide not to capture or kill Osama bin Laden?

Were there financial interests that ever stopped us from capturing of killing Osama bin Laden?

How many opportunities did the Bush Administration have to capture or kill Osama bin Laden after 9/11 and why did they fail?

Is Osama bin Laden a crazy mad man and a lunatic or is he a cold calculating well educated idealist?

Is Osama bin Laden actually suffering from Diabetes, Kidney failure, or anything else that requires dialysis?

Which is better, capturing Osama bin Laden, or killing him and why?Can Barack Obama "invade" Pakistan to hunt for Osama bin Laden?

Where is Osama bin Laden now?

Why can't we kill Osama bin Laden at the moment?

If we were to kill Osama bin Laden how would could we best accomplish it?

What if anything is wrong with the Bush administration's policy of "Afghanistan First, Iraq Second?"

Was there any direct or indirect connection between 9/11 and Iraq or Iraq and Al-Qaeda?

Can the recently proposed "Quiet Surge" in Afghanistan work? 

How much money does Osama bin Laden have access to?

Where does Osama bin Laden's money come from and how diversified is his income?

Why did he (Michael Scheuer) resign from the CIA in 2004?

Who is more dangerous to the United States, Al--Qaeda, Red China, Imperialist Russia, Shiite lead Iran, or Saudi Arabia and why? 

Michael Scheuer has said "Senators Clinton, Obama and McCain are all "clueless" as to what motivates Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda but Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul get it" so we asked why is that a true statement?

In light of that statement and in light of Michael Scheuer writing papers for and appearing with Ron Paul who is he supporting for President? 

Those were just a few of the issues covered with Michael Scheuer in my exclusive interview with him last night on the 7th anniversary of 9/11.

I ask that you listen to the interview, download it and then share it with your friends; what Michael Scheuer had to say was very revealing, informative, and enlightening. He has agreed to return in the future for a full two hours so this one hour interview was just the very tip of the iceberg but regardless, it should not be missed.

If you have any questions for Michael Scheuer I would be very happy to forward them to Michael and then report his response.
   

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain Leads in the Polls; Obama Camp in Desperate Times

 

About 10 days ago I reported that the Obama camp was seeing their poll number slip to a 6% lead from what was at one point almost an 8% to a 9% lead. A little more than one week later and most polls have the race called as a dead heat and many have McCain up by 5% and the resulting desperation is showing in the Obama camp as they are starting to implode.

Here's how I came to that conclusion...

The announcement of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as John McCain's running mate sent shock waves through the Obama staff. They helped chose Delaware Senator Joe Biden to be Obama's running mate in order to help combat McCain's experience gap with Obama. In Joe Biden they had hoped to find an attack dog, an outspoken hawkish maverick that knows McCain well and could attack him with near impunity.

The problem is that McCain chose a younger, more vibrant, undaunted, as yet uncorrupted, successful middle-class Judea/Christian mother and Governor of the largest oil rich state to be his running mate. That choice in and of itself sent an aftershock through the Obama camp because it took away the large bounce that they expected after the Invesco Field speech where an estimated 85,000 people watched from the stands and another 35 million caught the spectacle on TV.

Since then Obama has taken a huge amount of heat for not selecting Senator Hillary Clinton to be his running mate, essentially leaving a gap in party loyalty, and many in the press questioning if the wheels have come off the Obama train.

In recent days numerous reporters, 527 groups, union investigators, private investigators, reporters and political operatives have landed in Alaska searching for a needle in a haystack, wanting to find that one damning piece of evidence to shoot Palin down in flames.

The problem is that the McCain camp has done their homework and vetted her very well. They knew about her husband’s DUI 20 years ago, they knew about her support of "Jews for Jesus", her attendance of an Evangelical Assembly of God Church, her Down Syndrome son, her 5 children, her union membership, her eldest daughters teen pregnancy, the firing of her brother in law who as a law enforcement officer was caught drunk on the job, her canceling the bridge to nowhere, the scandalous rumors of an alleged affair, her NRA membership, her outspoken nature, her beauty queen good looks, etc. etc. They knew it all, good and bad, true and untrue.

To make matters worse, Obama went on Fox News and was interviewed by Bill O'Reilly and did not hold his own. He was swiftly shredded by O'Reilly in regards to Iraq, Homeland Security, taxes, his associations with Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers and others.

Worse still Obama proceeded to make these statements about the McCain / Palin ticket "You can put lipstick on a pig, It's still a pig; you can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It's still going to stink."Those statements have caused a huge backlash as Obama is seen as losing his grip and practicing a rude brand of politics he swore he would avoid.

His frustration, desperation and anger is showing and growing rapidly and here is the latest...

A neurologist from Mt. Sinai Hospital is questioning Joe Biden's ability to serve as VP due to his two previous bran aneurysms, stating that it can cause dementia, fits of anger, loss of deductive reasoning, problems with motor functions etc. Some are suggesting that Biden should voluntarily leave the ticket and that Hillary Clinton replace him due to medical reasons.

In my opinion the interview with both candidates conducted at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church started the beginning of the McCain revolution but no matter whether it was his straight forward answers, his selection of Palin, her acceptance speech, or his that eclipsed Obama's by 500,000 viewers, for now the Straight Talk Express has the upper hand; I just hope the momentum continues.

 

 

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Opens Up to "Real Americans"


During an interview with Chris Wallace of the Fox News Channel a self described senior advisor to the Obama campaign Robert Gibbs made what I think is a great point that provides Americans with a very clear distinction between the Obama campaign and the McCain campaign. Robert Gibbs said "This speech is extremely important because it’s your one chance to speak to tens of millions of people and speak in an unfiltered way about your character, your views and where you want to take the American people." After which Gibbs also said "we real excited that we opened up this convention to real Americans."

To me this comment suggest two things; first that Obama is somehow going to take America somewhere different instead of allowing the people to tell the government and the President which direction it wants to move in and what we want, like an American energy independence policy, secure borders, fewer taxes, no government waste, etc. It also reveals the one sided nature of Barack Obama because by Gibbs saying that the convention is being "opened up to real Americans" it makes it sound as if anyone who does not attend or agree with the Dali-Bama's speech is not a "real American."

The nuances may be subtle but they are real and it once more reveals the complete and utter arrogance of this candidate and his staff.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Audacity of Obama; Michelle Obama and "Tax Milk"

 

A month ago I began a Blog series called "The Audacity of Obama" each Blog covers a different aspect of him, his associations, etc. After the speech provided by his wife last night I though now was a great time to revive it and continue the series, this time all about her.

During last night's speech and as she traveled with the "Dali-Bama" this year Michelle has claimed over and over to have come from a down trodden neighborhood on the South side of Chicago, essentially the same are described in Jim Croce's 1973 recording hit "Bad Bad Leroy Brown." In the song Croce called it "the badest part of town." Truth be told, at least where Mrs. Obama grew up, wasn't. It was and is a well taken care of area with nice craftsman style red-brick homes that in no way resemble what she describes. So either she is lying or she does not remember her "middle-class" neighborhood with much fondness.

Her father was a middle-class guy with a $42,000 a year job at the water treatment facility, so she didn't come from poverty. She was by all accounts a smart, diligent student and was taking college level courses at an early age. Because of her grades and work ethic she was able to take special classes for talented and gifted students at a magnet school which helped her gain entry into Princeton where she graduated cumlaude 4 years later in 1985. Once she had graduated with honors it was only a matter of time before she was accepted to Harvard Law school, not bad for someone from a "bad neighborhood" on the south side of Chicago.

Stated plainly, her parents were devoted to their kids and pushed studies, middle-class values and hard work over television, and socializing with riff-raff, etc. Don't know about you but it doesn't sound like a bad life so far... just strict. So, is she lying and painting a poorer picture for impact, or does she genuinely remember things worse than they were?

If you ask me, she should be advocating this type of responsible behavior instead of pushing nanny-state politics on a new generations of people. Yet in numerous interviews with Newsweek, CNN, and others she has credited affirmative action for her making it, not her parents hard work, their dedication and her good grades. I don't get it, why credit the government for something she and her parents worked so hard for?

If she were to say that affirmative action was a "help to her" if and or when she was up against prejudice at college or in the job market, I could understand it, that is what it is supposed to do in my opinion. Instead it is used to dictate quotas when candidates are on par with one another. That would mean, using her logic, that she was a "token black" and I think discredits her accomplishments.

I don't like her because she gives credit where it is not due (the government) instead or shouting from the rooftops "look where hard work and good parental support got me, you can do it too." Instead she helps preach a message of government dependence and then also accepts "gratuities" from others due to her husband's status; like when the hospital she worked for doubled her salary some 260% when Obama was sworn in as a US Senator; how many of us would like to see our salary jump like that when it comes time for our yearly review?

Then there is the Rezko land deal, the campaign funds provided by donors with terrorist ties, the associations and friendships with William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, etc. Did I forget to mention the over $1,000,000.00 earmark that the "Dali-Bama" advocated for the hospital where she worked? Those are your tax dollars! Did I also forget to mention the exceedingly over advantageous home loan the Obama's received from Illinois Northern Trust when buying a multi-million dollar home on his Freshman US Senate salary?

The Obama's received a 5.625 percent loan on their 30-year fixed-rate mortgage of a $1,620,000.00 Georgian style fully restored mansion in an upscale Chicago neighborhood. It is what is called a "super super jumbo" there are no origination fees, penalties, discount points etc. Over the life of the loan they will save a minimum of at least $150,000.00. Folks this isn't just "sound investing" it is a sweetheart deal that most people could only dream of. All on his $165,000.00 a year salary. Remember this is before the book deals, her salary increase, the over 3 million dollars in investments back at Illinois Northern Trust, and so on.

The Obama's are not an average, everyday couple, they are not change agents, they do not represent a difference in Washington. They are a "power couple" who have rapidly learned that politics is vehicle to immediate wealth and power.

According to an NBC's Jim Popkin in an article dated March 25, 2008 "Their tax returns recently revealed that in 2000 their combined income was $240,505. That includes Sen. Obama's salary as a young state senator in Illinois, his fees ($16,500) as a "foundation director/educational speaker" and Michelle Obama's salary as a hospital administrator."

"In 2006, by contrast, the Obama’s' combined income was $983,826. Obama had become a U.S. Senator by then, making about $165,000 a year, and his wife's income at the University of Chicago hospitals had climbed sharply to about $265,000 a year. Sen. Obama's book-writing career also had become profitable, earning him $551,240 in author fees in tax year 2006 alone. Mrs. Obama also made $51,200 that year, as director of TreeHouse Foods, "a food manufacturer servicing primarily the retail grocery and food service chains," according to the company's website."

"The Obama’s' best financial year came in 2005, when their total combined income was $1.6 million. That included $1.2 million in author fees for Sen. Obama's best-selling books. Michelle Obama's salary that year was $316,962 plus another $45,000 for her role as director of TreeHouse Foods.

The Obama’s became more charitable as their incomes grew. In 2000, the couple gave $2,350 to charity, or about 1 percent of their gross income. In 2006, they donated $60,307 to charities, or about 6 percent of their gross income. In 2005, the Obama’s list a $5,000 donation to their church, Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, where the controversial Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr., was Sen. Obama's pastor. If Sen. Obama tithed more regularly to the church, there's no record of it in these tax returns."

What this indicates is that as they increased their political muscle after his now famous speech at the DNC in 2004 the Obama's latched onto "Uncle Sam's breast" and started feeding on government "tax milk." Her salary was doubled, and the hospital receives over one million dollars in earmarks; his home loan receives preferential treatment, and once it does he then in return votes in favor of the home loan bailout bill… it is a tit for tat game they are playing... and it is WRONG!

Remember Hillary Clinton's little stock deal that earned her $100,000.00... well Obama is headed in the same direction.

In their front page investigative must-read, Mike McIntire and Christopher Drew of the New York Times report: "Less than two months after ascending to the United States Senate, Barack Obama bought more than $50,000 worth of stock in two speculative companies whose major investors included some of his biggest political donors."

That is not change... that is politics as usual!

Michelle Obama could let her hard work and parents diligence speak for her and demonstrate her conscience of character instead of her greed and dependence on the government for success, but she chooses not to. Instead she is reaping the benefits of her husband's success and together they have started to siphon "tax milk" from the American people.

No good conservative will ever tell you that they are against free enterprise, capitalism or making money. Goodness knows we all want to make more than we do but there is a right way and a wrong way to do it.

I do NOT care how many houses the McCain's or the Obama's own, or how many investments and business ventures they get into to make an honest dollar... as long as they did not use their influence to obtain sweetheart deals or provide a quid-pro-quo to someone in exchange for the benefits of the ventures they get into.

Most important of all, don't start teaching the young people of American that the right way to be successful is by stepping on your neighbor, circumventing the law, making shady deals in a back room or having Uncle Sam (you and me) foot the bill for you.

Michelle Obama could have chosen to be a proud example of what is able to be accomplished in America the right way; instead, Michelle Obama represents the very worst of socialist "tax milkers."

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineAdd to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Posted by John Barnhart on August 26, 2008 at 12:43 PM in Current Affairs, Politics, Television, Terrorism, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) ShareThis

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain vs. Obama at Saddleback

BarackobamaetajohnmccainizandiragarTonight on "The John Barnhart Show" also known as "The Lion's Den" on the "Heading Right" radio channel of Blog Talk Radio, I will finally provide my own commentary on the McCain vs. Obama Q and A session conducted by Rick Warren at Saddleback Church last weekend.

The show will air from 7pm to 9pm CST, 8pm to 10pm EST callers are welcome to join in the conversation as we compare the responses of the two candidates to off the cuff questions, with none of the standard debate interruptions or the typical teleprompter assistance.

For anyone who missed the program on CNN, this review on my show is a MUST!

It will be just the candidates, Rick Warren, the crowd, and me. Expect some very biting but thoughtful commentary as I expose their responses to the light of common sense.

Not only will listeners obtain an interesting perspective by listening instead of watching the candidates give their responses, they will likely discover a few jewels of wit and wisdom from the candidates, Rick Warren, the crowd and of course the commentator (yours truly) along the way.

The direct link to my radio show is www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/HeadingRight/BarnhartBlog

Please join me, you will thank yourself later!

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Posted by John Barnhart on August 20, 2008 at 11:32 AM in Current Affairs, Politics, Religion, Terrorism, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) ShareThis

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Daniel New is Our Guest in The Lions Den Tonight on Blog Talk Radio !!!

August 12, 2008

Daniel New is Our Guest in The Lions Den Tonight on Blog Talk Radio !!!

LIVE Tonight! 9pm CST (10PM EST)

The Lion’s Den with host John Barnhart of www.barnhartblog.com

Special Guest  - Daniel New

Daniel New is the father of US Army Veteran Michael New who in the 1995 refused to serve under the UN and fought the US Government and former President Bill Clinton's Secret Executive Order requiring the military to do so. David New also helped to form the Constitutionalist Party in Texas and is the current party Vice Chairman.

Call in Number (347) 826-9560 or you can chat live during the program!

Direct Link to the show is http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/HeadingRight/BarnhartBlog/2008/08/13/The-Lions-Den-wwwbarnhartblogcom-Conservative-Talk

More details:

Mikenew Daniel New is the father of Michael New, the young man who as a member of the US Army refused to wear the UN beret and insignia based on his rights under UCMJ and the US Constitution. 13 years later the fight in regards to the case, the UN and the secrecy of Bill Clinton’s Secret Executive Order is not yet over.

After the recent incidents between Georgia and Russia and talk about possible US/UN intervention I thought it was important to bring this story back to the forefront.

Daniel New is the Vice Chairman of the Constitutionalist Party in Texas and he welcomes discussion in regards to why he left the Republican Party after fighting with the government for so long.

Daniel New is also the founder of "Independent Conservative Voters.com" http://www.independentconservativevoters.com/

Always passionate, his views may be potentially controversial to some, and right on with others, his ideas and views were crafted based on his experience with his son's case, the US Government, his belief in the Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and common sense.

Join us tonight at 9pm CST, 10pm EST. 

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

China Gets It; Why doesn't Obama?

China Gets It; Why Doesn't Obama?

Written By John Barnhart of www.barnhartblog.com

One would think that after over two hundred years of existence that libtards like "Dark Vader" Barack Obama would see the light and get it... English should be the official language of this country. Instead "Dark Vader" says we should all make sure that our kids learn to speak Spanish; a language that even he is not fluent in nor is his wife or his children. 30 states have already declared English the official language of their state, 83% of Americans responding to a Zogby poll (including the Spanish respondents) say that English should be the official language of the country.

Many of our founding fathers had the ability to speak other languages including Gaelic, French and German yet The Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, The Constitution, and The Bill of Rights were all written in one common language...ENGLISH!

Almost all of the documents, maps, monuments, buildings, roads we use and the products we buy use English to identify them.

For fun, to be different, out of habit, to celebrate the area in which we live and to express our individual diversity we may greet, bless or thank each other in other languages but the majority of our business is conducted in one language...ENGLISH. I watched the CNN video above again after watching some of the olympics from China, and even they get the importance of English.The players jerseys use English, the billboards, the advertising, the scoreboards again all use English. If the Red Chinese and the International Olympic commitee get it then why in the hell can't "Dark Vader" Barack Obama?

Embedded Video

Blogged with the Flock Browser
© 2008 John Barnhart www.barnhartblog.com - All Rights Reserved  Reproduction of Blog commentary is authorized when used in proper context and if proper credit is provided. All images are the property of their respective creators or owners.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Can Already Hear the Libtards... "Hamdan Convicted of a Traffic Violation?"

 

New York Times - GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba — A panel of six military officers convicted a former driver for Osama bin Laden of a war crime Wednesday, completing the first military commission trial here and the first conducted by the United States since the end of World War II.

The tribunal convicted Salim Ahmed Hamdan of war crimes and supporting terrorism after a 10 day trial.

The article goes on to say "...the commission acquitted the former driver, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, of a conspiracy charge, arguably the more serious of two charges he faced. His conviction came on a separate but lesser charge of providing material support for terrorism.

I can hear it now, the Libtard comedians on the left like David Letterman, Jay Leno, John Stewart will undoubtedly start making fun of the Bush administration for convicting Hamdam for simply driving Osama around. No doubt that the Alphabet media will do the same or at least question if this makes the War on Terror a success or worth the effort at all.

Mark my words within less than 24 hours you will start to hear the following "all they can do is convict Hamdan for a simple traffic violation?" they will go public with their rhetoric questioning if Hamdan was a significant enough participant in Al-Quaeda's plans to even bother with in the first place.

Then if he does indeed get a life sentence for providing support to terrorists they will try to attack the Bush administration, McCain and conservatives by questioning “is housing him for a life sentence is worth the cost?" Mark my words, they are already developing the comedy material, the video satire and writing Op-Ed pieces for it and were probably working on them weeks ago before the trial started.

Don't forget folks, the man has no soul, he was caught carrying missiles with him in 2001 while fighting in Afghanistan, he knew about 9/11 before it happened, he helped Osama bin Laden with moving about, the transfer of weapons, materials, the movement and distribution of information, communication, and personnel.

I could care less if he was a big fish or a little one... when the Libtards start railing on the Bush administration for convicting Hamdan of “driving while stupid” it's worth remembering that he helped support this...

Embedded Video

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: 

 

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineAdd to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama; As Arrogant as He Wants to Be

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com

In his books and speeches Obama clings to the story that he is a poor man with very humble beginnings, he was impoverished, picked himself up by his boot straps and seized the American dream. He portrays himself to be the essential rags to riches candidate who believes in unity, fairness and has humble altruistic beliefs.

Last week Barack Obama once again stepped out of the shadow of his own selfless rhetoric and into the spotlight of his own personal sunshine revealing himself to be exactly what many of us believed him to be long ago; an arrogant, naïve, snob, with Marxist leanings who attempts to hide his sense of personal entitlement and quietly militant views behind his flowery speeches.

Amd_obamaseal Last week Barack Obama revealed his own version of the Great Seal of the President of the United States which he took a lot of heat for from the press. The Obama campaign now says it will never be used again and claim it was meant to be used just one day, yet they told “The Atlantic.com” something different, they told their representatives that it would be used throughout the campaign.

Sounds similar to other issues and incidents where Obama has had to find a way to separate himself for political expediency or risk drowning in his own arrogance for maintaining a position, or a relationship; Reverend Wright, Tony Rezko, Father Pfleger, William Ayers, Samantha Power, Jim Johnson, Rob Malley, his wife’s ties to Hamas charity “Kindhearts”, Obama’s ties to Hamas fundraiser Hatem El-Hady, women in head scarves who were asked not to stand behind Obama because they would appear Muslim on TV, specific white people who were asked to stand behind Obama because more whites needed to be seen on TV, his wife’s ties with Wal-Mart and Tree House foods which shut down multiple plants where mostly Hispanics worked, his position on unconditional talks with Iran, Venezuela, Syria, N. Korea, pulling the troops out of Iraq immediately, providing drivers licenses to illegal aliens, etc. the list is becoming extensive and the incident with the Presidential Seal is just the latest.

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thank You for Reading www.barnhartblog.com

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com
  

Thank you to everyone who has ever read my Blog at www.barnhartblog.com  or http://johnbarnhart.blogtownhall.com/ 

The readers of my Blog is an extremely diverse group, they come from all walks of life, have various social and political beliefs, and are from many different states and foreign countries. 

www.barnhartblog.com being is being read by analysts, attorneys, broadcasters, bloggers, college students, commentators, doctors, home makers, law enforcement, musicians, newscasters, politicians, retirees, reporters, sales people, truckers and writers. 

Despite www.barnhartblog.com being written from the perspective of a middle-class American Conservative it is none-the-less being read by people with very diverse political beliefs including Anarchists, Conservatives, Democrats, Independents, Liberals, Libertarians, Moderates, Neo-Conservatives, Republicans and even Socialists.

www.barnhartblog.com is written and published near Austin, Texas but thanks to the internet it has far reaching appeal and is being read by people in Canada, Mexico, Germany, Taiwan, The Philippines, The United Kingdom as well as the United States from Maine to Hawaii and everywhere in between. 

As of yesterday between www.barnhartblog.com and http://johnbarnhart.blogtownhall.com/ my Blog has several thousand readers and hundreds of email responses, not too shabby for a plain ordinary middle-class guy with an opinion and a computer. 

Though few people have posted comments in response to my Blog the amount of direct emails is quite large and I have done my best to respond to each of them. 

Once again, thank you for reading, subscribing and responding, knowing that people are interested in what I have to say and that they are, in some cases, contacting their political officials in response to makes blogging worthwhile.

If you wish to respond to my opinions via email, make a request or have a suggestion just hit the email link on my Blog page and I will respond.

Warmest Regards,

John
www.barnhartblog.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 4 - The Audacity of Lies; The Democrats Monumental List of Broken Promises

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 3 - The Audacity of Lies; the Democrats Monumental List of Broken Promises

Dem_party_seal_2 This was originally posted on www.barnhartblog.com

This year Barack Obama is promising America "Change We Can Believe In" and it sounds great but before you take Obama at his word, review the 3rd part of my Blog Series "The Audacity of Lies; the Democrats Monumental List of Broken Promises."

It details how the Democrat party promised Americans they would change Washington D.C. in 2006 if we would only put them in charge.

Well...we did, they lied, and we are all paying the price for trusting them. Don't take my word for it, read the promises Democrats made to America and then judge on your own if they did or did not fulfill their promise provide change, to lower gas prices and make us energy independent.

Promise: “Democrats have a plan to lower gas prices…join Democrats who are working to lower gas prices now.” Then Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Press Release, April 19, 2006

Broken Promise: The average price of gasoline is now $4.05 cents a gallon and oil is now $140.00 per barrel.

Barnhart Blog Observation: This week the US Senate tried to pass a bill that would have increased windfall profit taxes on oil companies and the oil companies would have passed that cost on to consumers. Last week, Senate Democrats tried to pass the Cap-and-Trade "Climate Security Act" which would have added an immediate $1.50 tax increase to the price of every gallon of gas. Luckily, Republican Mitch McConnell saw it for what it was, started a filibuster on the Democrat money grab and put a stop to both of pieces of liberal legislation.

Promise: “Democrats promise to hit the ground running on energy issues if they win control of the House or Senate. Responding to voters’ concerns about $3-a-gallon gasoline and the soaring cost of home-heating oil, Democratic leaders in both chambers have ranked energy as one of their top priorities for the next Congress.” – “Energy Reserving a Front Burner,” National Journal, September 9, 2006

Broken Promise: “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) issued a clear directive soon after Democrats took control of Congress this year, promising a comprehensive energy and climate change bill on the House floor by the Fourth of July. But with five legislative work weeks to go before that deadline, House Democrats are still left with the task of cobbling together a bill from as many as 11 committees…As for the deadline itself, a House Democrat aide close to the process said the package will not arrive on the House floor before the July Fourth recess.” “Energy Policy Moving on Multiple Fronts,” Energy & Environment Daily, May 18, 2007.

Hippiepelosi_3 Promise: “The most urgent environmental issue facing us today is global warming.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 9 

Broken Promise: “Pelosi Says Global Warming Bill Might Wait Until Next Year” Headline, Congress Daily PM, June, 1, 2007.

Barnhart Blog Observation: The reason for her delay…Pelosi was hoping that the Cap-and-Trade "Climate Security Act" would pass in the Senate while the rest of America was asleep at the wheel and being hypnotized by the Democrat primary race. No such luck Nancy, we reject the idea of being taxed for helping you balance the budget while paying for the myth of "solving the climate crisis."

The idea that "We Can Solve It" is ridiculous. There is NOTHING to solve. Bush, Gingrich, Lieberman, Warner, McCain and others who claim to be conservatives should be ashamed for buying into the climate change hocus pocus.

Economists and scientists and even United Nations reports show that to change the temperature of the earth by just two degrees Celsius would cost $26 TRILLION US Dollars, for just $5 Trillion we could give every adult in the world a basic college education and since it is a lack of education that helps create poverty, wouldn't that be a better endeavor to spend our money on?

Gorepoot1s_2 Besides, even if we all listen to liberal ding-bat Al Gore, his book details statistics that global warming is only going to go up at most 1 degree over the next 100 years. If that is what all the concern is over then let’s use a few million dollars and buy everyone on the earth air conditioning. There is no reason for us to be so stupid and keep listening to climate change alarmists. Damn people ... have you forgotten all the climate change baloney of the 70's, 80's, 90's not to mention the phony Y2K scare?

Anyone who says they believe in global warming, global cooling, or climate change, please ... do me a favor ... go sit in a pumpkin patch on Halloween night next October, if you do I promise the Great Pumpkin will arrive at midnight and bring you candy and toys, I swear.

Promise: “To free America from dependence on foreign oil, we will achieve energy independence for America by 2020 by eliminating reliance on oil from the Middle East and other unstable regions of the world.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 6

Broken Promise: During the first year of the Democrat-controlled Congress, no energy independence legislation has been passed by the House, much less sent to the President’s desk. But 228 Democrats voted to impose more than $6.5 billion in new taxes on small and independent American energy producers, which will lead to less domestic supply, higher prices for consumers, and an increase in America’s dependence on foreign sources. Roll Call Vote #40, January 18, 2007.

Barnhart Blog Observation: The cost of gas and other fuels and energy sources not to mention food is much higher than it was in 2006 and 2007. Democrats are pointing fingers at “Big Oil” for the rise in fuel prices but truth be told, liberal hedge fund investors like George Soros are investing in oil speculation but the Democrats are not going after hedge fund speculators ….because they donate to liberal candidates and political organizations 2x or 3x the amount of money they donate to conservative candidates and organizations.

Before you start pointing fingers at "Big Oil", Bush, Cheney, Halliburton, Exxon or anyone else, go check out Madison Avenue and Wall Street and start knocking on the doors of oil speculators, the same companies that helped to create the Dot-Com and Real Estate busts of the past are now over inflating the market value of oil.

Promise: “Besides encouraging the bio-fuel market and infrastructure, it also aims to encourage coal-to-liquids as an alternative fuel through the U.S. military’s purchasing power. The majority leader said the bill is complementary to the rural working group’s bio-fuels act and has the support of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell, D-Mich.” “US Representative Hoyer: $15B Energy Bill Outlines House Democrats’ Plans,” Dow Jones, March 1, 2007

Broken Promise: “The coal-to-liquids amendment showcased the difficult debate ahead for Democratic leaders as they try to craft multiple bills this year dealing with energy and global warming. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calf.) is not an advocate of coal-to-liquids plants…” “Coal-to-Liquids Vote Caps House Energy Markup,” Environment & Energy Daily, June 21, 2007

Promise: “Our New Direction will send our energy dollars to the Midwest, not to the Middle East.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 9 

Broken Promise: “The Rahall energy bill proposes a systematic stripping of provisions from the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) that aimed to increase access for new energy development on federal lands.” “Independent Oil Producers Ally with Wind against Rahall’s Energy Bill,” Energy Washington, June 6, 2007.

Pelosinozone_2 Barnhart Blog Observation: Massachusetts is just one among many other states including Alaska, California, Arizona, Idaho, Texas, Montana, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Louisiana, Virginia, Minnesota that have asked for the right to either drill for oil, produce coal oil, shale oil, hemp fuel, sugar cane fuel, or open wind, solar or nuclear power plants that are still being denied by Congress, all while we all are forced to pay $4.05 a gallon for gasoline. More than a year after Democrats took power in Congress; no comprehensive energy reform has happened and virtually no energy bills were sent to the President.

Liberal environmentalist nuts and others, who have caved to global warming or climate change nonsense, have refused to drill for oil in ANWR or in states who have asked for more ability to drill in their borders. Montana alone has enough shale oil and coal oil available to last us 40 years.

Obama_empty_box_2 Promise: “Double the percentage of renewable fuels sold in America. Make sure that… cellulosic sources, such as switch grass are a key part of that increase.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 10

Broken Promise: “Currently, according to the ethanol industry’s list of producers in the United States, none of the ethanol comes from cellulose and even if commercial plants can be built, the process may still prove too expensive to compete with corn ethanol.” “Will Cellulosic Ethanol Take Off?” Technology Review, February 27, 2007. 

Barnhart Blog Observation: The only thing Congress did in reference to increasing Ethanol production was dictate that more of our fuel supply should come from Ethanol corn. You might say that seems to make sense, we need more fuel and Democrats see themselves as the only friend that farmers have, so helping farmers by giving them an increase in the Ethanol fuel subsidy is a good compromise. Well, not exactly. Ethanol does come from corn, but it is not extracted from the same corn crops used to feed animals or humans, but since farmers were provided a government subsidy to plant more Ethanol corn, that was what they did. As a result, there is less corn for animal feed and even less for use in other products used or consumed by humans. It seems congress has yet to figure out that when people are given an incentive to do something, they will usually do it. I know if the price of gas was lower, millions of Americans would have more money to save, invest or use to buy goods and services. No wonder our economy is in such terrible shape right now.

Promise: “Democrats stand for… finding meaningful solutions to our energy crisis. We will make America more competitive and not heap mountains of debt on future generations.” Then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Press Conference, June 16, 2006

Broken Promise: “The main challengers to U.S. economic power – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have overtaken the United States in dominating the global energy industry, according to a new study by Goldman Sachs.” Study: “‘BRICs’ Overtake U.S. in Energy,” Associated Press, Tuesday, June 26, 2007.

House Democrats weakened U.S. energy competitiveness by voting to repeal the American-energy production initiatives crafted by Republicans as part of the 2005 Energy Policy Act and instead replacing them with new bureaucratic roadblocks that undermine efforts to increase domestic energy supplies for consumers in the future. Roll Call Vote #40, January 18, 2007

Barnhart Blog Observation: Brazil is using fuel made from sugar cane and is now energy independent. Cuba, China and Venezuela are “slant drilling” for oil off of the US coastline and are therefore obtaining oil that is actually under American territorial waters. The US could be growing industrial sativa hemp, and it alone could produce 4x the amount of ethanol and other bio-fuels than corn, flax or sugar cane.

Promise: “We have a strong commitment to research and development.” Then-Minority-Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Press Conference, September 7, 2006

Broken Promise: As part of the FY 2008 Interior Appropriations bill, Democrats voted to eliminate the Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas Research and Development Program created by Republicans in 2005 and utilized by petroleum engineers at 23 major research universities and four non-profit research institutions. – H.R. 2463, FY 2008 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, Roll Call Vote #579, June 27, 2007

Obama_promise_3  Promise: “Senate Democrats are renewing their effort to require electric utilities to produce more power from renewable sources such as wind and solar. . . Many House Democrats . . . are on record supporting a renewable standard . . . House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. . . . ‘Believes we need to increase the amount of electricity that comes from renewable sources in the United States above where we are today,’ a Pelosi aide said.”“Senate Democrats See Opening for Renewable Standard,” Congressional Quarterly Green Sheets, May 25, 2007

Broken Promise: “Wind energy advocates say the House Democrats’ bill could significantly cripple the burgeoning industry, and they brand the measure ‘anti-wind.’ A release from the American Wind Energy Association last month said the House Democrats’ plan could ‘essentially outlaw’ the generation of electricity from new wind power plants in the United States.” “A Pesky proposal for Wind Power Plants,” Associated Press, June 4, 2007

Promise: “Democrats will energize America by declaring energy independence … That is our commitment.”  Then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Annual 2006 Take Back America Conference, June 14, 2006

Broken Promise: During their first six months, House Democrats have declared only that they are incapable of governing when it comes to matters such as energy policy. Instead of passing comprehensive legislation as promised to make America less dependent on foreign energy sources, House Democrats have offered legislation that would make energy independence more difficult by dissuading U.S. refiners from investing billions to expand refining capacity to meet rising demand. Instead of lower prices . . . the legislation could cause higher prices by unintentionally capping or restricting domestic refinery capacity.” “Wrong Direction,” Houston Chronicle Editorial, June 24, 2007

Promise: “As the U.S. chases larger oil supplies, we are failing to notice the flashing neon signs pointing to the potential of our most abundant domestic energy resource – coal. Liquefaction and gasification technologies are available right under our noses. They are being used with success by some of our most assertive foreign economic competitors who recognize the folly of dependence on oil and are doing something about it. It’s time we did as well.” Then-Ranking Member of the House Resources Committee, Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV), Press Release, April 26, 2006 

“With a nation hard and fast on a petroleum diet for decades to come brought forth by the pending legislation, the widespread commercialization of coal-to-liquids technology to fuel our vehicles will continue to be an elusive goal. I have never forsaken the coal miners in my Congressional District, and I am not about to do so now.” Then-Ranking Member of the House Resources Committee, Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV), Floor Statement, June 29, 2006

Broken Promise: “Republicans also may offer an amendment to boost coal production to put [now-House Resources Committee Chairman] Rahall in a tough spot, the aide said. Rahall represents a coal-mining district but his bill does not address coal.”“House GOP Plans Amendments to Counter Rahall Energy Bill,” Dow Jones Newswire, June 6, 2007.

Barnhart Blog Observation: Chairman Rahall opposed several amendments to promote coal technology that are in the best interests of his own district, not to mention the American people, all because he is a global warming alarmist and he does not want to upset oil and hedge fund speculators like George Soros.

Promise: “We’ll make this Fourth of July energy independence day...” Speaker-Elect Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Press Conference, May 9, 2007

Broken Promise: “The House energy bill has devolved into a heated battle that threatens to spoil Democrats’ hopes of passing an overhaul of energy policy by July 4.” “Pelosi vs. Dingell Heats Up; Energy Tension Rises at Meeting,” Roll Call, June 13, 2007.

Note: House members departed for the 2007 Fourth of July district work period without passing energy independence legislation of any kind.

No party remains blameless. Republicans could have fought harder when they controlled congress to help make us energy independent, instead they caved to pressure from foreign allies and from liberal Democrats and created no new nuclear plants, no refineries, or oil pipelines. In their own way Republicans helped Democrats put us in this situation. There is more than enough blame to go around especially when considering the Bush administration agreed to help Saudi Arabia investigate the viability of nuclear power plants when they have an abundance of solar energy available to them.

One final thought...10 years ago liberal Democrats and the Hollywood elite were defending Bill Clinton by saying that his White House perjury scandal was all bout sex and will have no impact on his decision making. Well...that is not exactly true. While Bill was busy playing hide the cigar with Monica Lewinsky he not only neglected to take out Osama Bin Laden multiple times he also canceled billions of dollars worth of oil drilling leases in California, Oregon, Washington, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, the Pacific Ocean, Mexico, the Atlantic Ocean and many others so he could do his part to help save the environment.

If you would like to thank the former President for helping add to current gas prices you call or write him by going to this link; http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=734086

If you would like to call or write the current congressional leaders from your state you may do so by using this link for the House of Representatives; http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/index.html

And this link to contact the US Senate; http://www.senate.gov/

Part 4 of my blog series is dedicated to Democrats broken promises in regards to the 9/11 Commission and national security. After today’s ruling by the Supreme Court in regards to the rights of enemy combatants at GITMO you will not want to miss it.

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part 2 - The Audacity of Lies; the Democrats Monumental List of Broken Promises

Originally Posted on www.barnhartblog.com

Blog No. 2 in a Series

The 110th Democrat Congress promised Americans in 2006 that if only people would vote for them, life would be better, not unlike what Senator Obama is doing these days. One has only to listen to a few of his speeches or read his books in order to become Obamatized and sucked in by his words and promises of "Change."

Based on recent congressional history Obama is no different than Nancy Pelosi and is promising change that will never happen and even if it did would ruin our nation.

Picking up with where I left off yesterday in regards to the list of unfulfilled promises or outright lies told by the 110th Congress when they promised to change America in 2006 lets look at the subjects of student loans, raises for teachers, 401K benefits, and social security funding.

Nancy_pelosi Promise: “Our new direction plan will slash interest rates on college loans in half to … 4.25% for parents.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 17

Broken Promise: “Although Kennedy’s proposal would reduce rates on parent-borrowed PLUS loans to 4.25 percent from 8.5, the House bill offers no break.” “Bills to Ease Student Loan Rates on Hill,” Chicago Tribune, February 4, 2007

Promise: “Our New Direction plan will slash interest rates on college loans in half to 3.4% for students …” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 17

Broken Promise: Democrats drastically scaled back their plans for a student loan interest rate cut shortly after taking power in Congress. And six months after Democrats took power, no legislation to cut student loan interest rates – temporarily or otherwise – has been sent to the President. “The much-touted House Democratic measure to slash in half student loan interest rates over five years has been drafted to offer only temporary relief.” “House Dems Offer Only Temporary Student Loan Rate Cut,” Congress Daily AM, January 16, 2007.

Barnhart Blog Observation: College tuition has increased by 6.6% to an average total cost of $13,589 per year. Private universities average $32,307 per year and the most expensive private Ivy League universities have surpassed $50,000 per year. Barack Obama has already stated he wants to put an end to college loan programs. One question…how the hell does he plan to help students get an education without educational loans? His proposed $4000 tax credit in return for public service won’t pay for even a ½ year of college.

Promise: “A college education is as important today as high school was a generation ago – and Democrats intend to make attending college just as affordable and available to all.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 17

Broken Promise: “‘It’s a great sound bite – cutting rates in half,’ says Mark Kantrowitz, the publisher of FinAid.org, which gives information about ways to pay for college. ‘But it’s an incredibly expensive proposal with very little student aid benefit. The benefit … comes after students have graduated, which makes it unlikely to get more low-income students to enroll in college, especially since they tend to fear debt more.’” “Congress Moves to Cut College Loan Costs,” Christian Science Monitor, January 16, 2007.

Note the Ridiculous: House Education & Labor Committee Democrats also voted en masse against a GOP alternative proposal that would have used savings from higher education programs to increase funding for the Pell Grant college access program by $12 billion over the next five years, instead voting for a Democratic measure that puts the bulk of that money into benefits for individuals who have already graduated from college and earned a degree. This helps college graduates, not hopeful attendees, yet liberal Democrats expect the American public to pay for the education of illegal immigrants…give me a break.

Promise: “It’s time to revive the standards movement by attracting top-flight teachers by rewarding them for performance, not just credentials …” The Plan, Rahm Emanuel & Bruce Reed, Page 77

Screwed Broken Promise: As Democratic Caucus Chairman, Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) is co-sponsor of a bill that fails to fulfill his promise – the Teacher Excellence for All Children Act (H.R. 2204), legislation authored by Education and Labor Committee Democrats that places a premium on teacher credentials and tenure, rather than on classroom performance. Republicans, however, have stepped forward with legislation to reward good teachers for good performance. Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) has introduced the Teacher Incentive Fund Act (H.R. 1761), a Republican alternative to provide grants to local school districts to design and implement their own performance pay systems to reward teachers for closing the achievement gap inside the classroom.

Promise: “From now on, every job ought to come with a 401(k). . . Employers should be required to offer 401(k)s, and workers will be enrolled unless they choose otherwise.” The Plan, Rahm Emanuel & Bruce Reed, Page 55

“We should require all employers to offer workers a pension or 401(k) ….” The Plan, Rahm Emanuel & Bruce Reed, Page 91

Broken Promise: As of June 27, 2007, no legislation to encourage universal retirement savings has been passed by the Democratic Congress. In fact, last year the majority of House Democrats (including now-Speaker Nancy Pelosi) voted against the Pension Protection Act, the most comprehensive reforms of the worker pension system in more than a generation. Of note, the Pension Protection Act included measures to automatically enroll employees into worker 401(k) savings plans.
Roll Call Vote #422, July 28, 2006

Promise: “We will not borrow the money from the Social Security trust fund and from other creditors around the world.” Rep. Rob Andrews (D-NJ), House Floor Remarks, March 28, 2007

Broken Promise: 215 Democrats, including Democratic Rep. Rob Andrews (D-NJ), voted “NO” on a Republican proposal to prohibit increases in authorization spending levels if the Social Security surplus has been spent the previous year. Roll Call Vote #300, May 3, 2007

Promise: “We will ensure retirement security every day by protecting Social Security, protecting pensions and making savings easier for retirement for our seniors.” – Then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) “Press Conference,” July 28, 2006

Broken Promise: “The Democrats’ spending plan does nothing at all to address the problems facing the Social Security and Medicare systems, which are growing ever closer to spending more than they take in as the gigantic baby boom generation ages and retires.” – “A New Budget Proposal in No Way Unassuming,” The Republican (Springfield, MA) Editorial, May 17, 2007 

Note: House Democrats voted en masse against a House Republican substitute budget that would have achieved balance by 2012 while ending the raid on Social Security, voting instead for a Democratic budget that allows the raiding to continue.

Barnhart Blog Observation: Keep in mind Democrats refused to pass a constitutional amendment back in the 1980’s that would require the government to balance the budget each year, almost thirty years later we are still dealing with the issue and making remedial stop-gap measures to secure social security funding instead of allowing the American people to decide how they want to invest the majority of their retirement savings.

I hope that this series of Blogs has opened your eyes to the lies that congress has told to win your vote. Just wait, it gets even better -  the next installment is exclusively dedicated to energy and gas prices. If it does not tick you off and get you boiling mad, nothing will.

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Posted by John Barnhart on June 12, 2008 at 03:26 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) ShareThis

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »