About Me

Name: John Barnhart
Email: barnhart@barnhartblog.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

"Just Say No!" to the Bailout John McCain!

Before reading this, I want it understood, this is not the official position of www.letsgetthisright.com or anyone else, this is MY PERSONAL OPINION and does not represent my position as a staffer of www.letsgetthisright.com

 

American's need to stand up and tell John McCain to "Just Say No!"

 

If one reads just the title of the bill that was voted down yesterday it has absolutely nothing to do with the government’s attempted bail out to the tune of $700 Billion dollars. For those who are unaware here is the title of the "bailout bill"

 

BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes 

 

(what the hell... how can anyone make heads or tails of that title referencing a bailout bill???)

 

No American should be in favor of this bail out - you don't fix a temporary problem within a capitalist economy with a permanent socialist solution. Hell, even 95 democrats agreed yesterday that the bailout is the WRONG solution.

 

This is one of those occasions where I DO NOT support the President’s position!

 

President Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Rahm Emanuel,  John Murtha, Charlie Rangel, and a host of other liberals are in favor of this ridiculous bill, the Republicans who supported it should be ashamed and do not represent true conservative values.

 

In my own personal opinion, if John McCain wants to have any hope of winning the White House and thereby help Sarah Palin as a potential future President, he should immediately separate his position from that of the President, Secretary Paulson, Senator Obama, as well as the Democrats and Republicans who support the bailout.

 

I like McCain, I like Palin and they are the ticket I am supporting, but the folks at the top of the campaign who are giving them advice need to hush, stop pushing a bad agenda, and listen to the voice of the American people on this one and let John McCain and Sarah Palin act accordingly.

 

Let us, "We The People" figure out how to get this right, by allowing us to participate in the general economy to fix it over time, the bailout bill is the equivalent of using morphine to cure a bad flu bug, the cure is not only the wrong prescription, it is more deadly than the illness itself.

 

John McCain needs to be the Maverick that many Americans like, respect and are comfortable voting for.

 

Senator John McCain should immediately come out and "Just Say No" to the bail out and suggest the following or something very similar to it;

 

 

1. Suspend the Mark-to-Market Rule - If short selling can be suspended on 799 stocks (an arbitrary number and a warning of the rule by bureaucrats which is coming under the Paulson plan), the mark-to-market rule can be suspended for six months and then replaced with a more accurate three year rolling average mark-to-market.


 

2. Repeal Sarbanes Oxley - It failed with Freddy Mac. It failed with Fannie Mae. It failed with Bear Stearns. It failed with Lehman Brothers. It failed with AIG. It is crippling our entrepreneurial economy. I spent three days this week in Silicon Valley. Everyone agreed Sarbanes-Oxley was crippling the economy. One firm told me they would bring more than 20 companies public in the next year if the law was repealed. Its Sarbanes-Oxley’s $3 million per startup annual accounting fee that is keeping these companies private.

3. Match our competitors in China and Singapore by going to a zero capital gains tax - Private capital will flood into Wall Street with zero capital gains and it will come at no cost to the taxpayer. Even if you believe in a static analytical model in which lower capital gains taxes mean lower revenues for the Treasury, a zero capital gains tax costs much less than the Paulson plan. And if you believe in a historic model (as I do), a zero capital gains tax would lead to a dramatic increase in federal revenue through a larger, more competitive and more prosperous economy.

4. Immediately pass an “all of the above” energy plan - that is designed to bring home $500 billion of the $700 billion a year we are sending overseas. With that much energy income the American economy would boom and government revenues would grow.

 

5. Immediately DEMAND investigations - of those responsible for directly influencing the current economic situation due to either direct action or inaction, be they captains of industry, lobbyists or politicians and as McCain would say "make them famous" and let the FBI, the Justice Dept. and the Federal Court systems follow up from there.

 

None of these suggestions are new, they are supported by Conservative politicians and business men like New Gingrich (who actually made those proposals on Sept. 21st - See Forbes Magazine and National Review Online from that date) and there are also plenty of "hip and trendy" socially left "pop culture icons" like Donald Trump who favor the concept of "Just Say No" as well.

 

There is NO REASON for John McCain to support a bailout bill that both George Bush and Barack Obama support and 83% to 86% of Americans on both sides DO NOT support!

 

John McCain MUST be on the RIGHT side of history on this bill, I say call and email the McCain campaign, and his Senate offices and tell them to tell John McCain to "Just Say No!" 

 

John McCain Campaign Office

(703) 418-2008 or http://www.johnmccain.com/Contact/

Senatorial Offices

·         Phoenix Office:

5353 North 16th Street
Suite 105
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Main: 602-952-2410
Fax: 602-952-8702

·         Tempe Office:

4703 South Lakeshore Drive
Suite 1
Tempe, AZ 85282
Main: 480-897-6289
Fax: 480-897-8389

·         Tucson Office:

407 West Congress Street
Suite 103
Tucson, AZ 85701
Main: 520-670-6334
Fax: 520-670-6637

·         Washington Office:

241 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Main: 202-224-2235
Fax: 202-228-2862

Below is the result of the roll call vote from yesterday.

H R 3997 RECORDED VOTE 29-Sep-2008 2:07 PM       

BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes

AYES Democrat 140

Republican 65    

NOES Democrat 95

Republican 133    

NOT VOTING Republican 1   (Shame on you Congressman Weller!)

TOTALS AYES 205 NOES 228      QUESTION: On Concurring in Senate Amendment With An Amendment

Ackerman D NY legislator Aye
Allen D ME legislator Aye
Andrews D NJ legislator Aye
Arcuri D NY legislator Aye
Baird D WA legislator Aye
Baldwin D WI legislator Aye
Bean D IL legislator Aye
Berman D CA legislator Aye
Berry D AR legislator Aye
Bishop (GA) D GA legislator Aye
Bishop (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Boren D OK legislator Aye
Boswell D IA legislator Aye
Boucher D VA legislator Aye
Boyd (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Brady (PA) D PA legislator Aye
Brown, Corrine D FL legislator Aye
Capps D CA legislator Aye
Capuano D MA legislator Aye
Cardoza D CA legislator Aye
Carnahan D MO legislator Aye
Clarke D NY legislator Aye
Clyburn D SC legislator Aye
Cohen D TN legislator Aye
Cooper D TN legislator Aye
Costa D CA legislator Aye
Cramer D AL legislator Aye
Crowley D NY legislator Aye
Davis (AL) D AL legislator Aye
Davis (CA) D CA legislator Aye
Davis (IL) D IL legislator Aye
DeGette D CO legislator Aye
DeLauro D CT legislator Aye
Dicks D WA legislator Aye
Dingell D MI legislator Aye
Donnelly D IN legislator Aye
Doyle D PA legislator Aye
Edwards (TX) D TX legislator Aye
Ellison D MN legislator Aye
Ellsworth D IN legislator Aye
Emanuel D IL legislator Aye
Engel D NY legislator Aye
Eshoo D CA legislator Aye
Etheridge D NC legislator Aye
Farr D CA legislator Aye
Fattah D PA legislator Aye
Foster D IL legislator Aye
Frank (MA) D MA legislator Aye
Gonzalez D TX legislator Aye
Gordon D TN legislator Aye
Gutierrez D IL legislator Aye
Hall (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Hare D IL legislator Aye
Harman D CA legislator Aye
Hastings (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Higgins D NY legislator Aye
Hinojosa D TX legislator Aye
Holt D NJ legislator Aye
Honda D CA legislator Aye
Hooley D OR legislator Aye
Hoyer D MD legislator Aye
Israel D NY legislator Aye
Johnson, E. B. D TX legislator Aye
Kanjorski D PA legislator Aye
Kennedy D RI legislator Aye
Kildee D MI legislator Aye
Kind D WI legislator Aye
Klein (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Langevin D RI legislator Aye
Larsen (WA) D WA legislator Aye
Larson (CT) D CT legislator Aye
Levin D MI legislator Aye
Loebsack D IA legislator Aye
Lofgren, Zoe D CA legislator Aye
Lowey D NY legislator Aye
Mahoney (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Maloney (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Markey D MA legislator Aye
Marshall D GA legislator Aye
Matsui D CA legislator Aye
McCarthy (NY) D NY legislator Aye
McCollum (MN) D MN legislator Aye
McDermott D WA legislator Aye
McGovern D MA legislator Aye
McNerney D CA legislator Aye
McNulty D NY legislator Aye
Meek (FL) D FL legislator Aye
Meeks (NY) D NY legislator Aye
Melancon D LA legislator Aye
Miller (NC) D NC legislator Aye
Miller, George D CA legislator Aye
Mollohan D WV legislator Aye
Moore (KS) D KS legislator Aye
Moore (WI) D WI legislator Aye
Moran (VA) D VA legislator Aye
Murphy (CT) D CT legislator Aye
Murphy, Patrick D PA legislator Aye
Murtha D PA legislator Aye
Nadler D NY legislator Aye
Neal (MA) D MA legislator Aye
Oberstar D MN legislator Aye
Obey D WI legislator Aye
Olver D MA legislator Aye
Pallone D NJ legislator Aye
Pelosi D CA speaker Aye
Perlmutter D CO legislator Aye
Pomeroy D ND legislator Aye
Price (NC) D NC legislator Aye
Rahall D WV legislator Aye
Rangel D NY legislator Aye
Reyes D TX legislator Aye
Richardson D CA legislator Aye
Ross D AR legislator Aye
Ruppersberger D MD legislator Aye
Ryan (OH) D OH legislator Aye
Sarbanes D MD legislator Aye
Schakowsky D IL legislator Aye
Schwartz D PA legislator Aye
Sestak D PA legislator Aye
Sires D NJ legislator Aye
Skelton D MO legislator Aye
Slaughter D NY legislator Aye
Smith (WA) D WA legislator Aye
Snyder D AR legislator Aye
Space D OH legislator Aye
Speier D CA legislator Aye
Spratt D SC legislator Aye
Tanner D TN legislator Aye
Tauscher D CA legislator Aye
Towns D NY legislator Aye
Tsongas D MA legislator Aye
Van Hollen D MD legislator Aye
Velazquez D NY legislator Aye
Wasserman Schultz D FL legislator Aye
Waters D CA legislator Aye
Watt D NC legislator Aye
Waxman D CA legislator Aye
Weiner D NY legislator Aye
Wexler D FL legislator Aye
Wilson (OH) D OH legislator Aye
Bachus R AL legislator Aye
Blunt R MO legislator Aye
Boehner R OH legislator Aye
Bonner R AL legislator Aye
Bono Mack R CA legislator Aye
Boozman R AR legislator Aye
Brady (TX) R TX legislator Aye
Brown (SC) R SC legislator Aye
Calvert R CA legislator Aye
Camp (MI) R MI legislator Aye
Campbell (CA) R CA legislator Aye
Cannon R UT legislator Aye
Cantor R VA legislator Aye
Castle R DE legislator Aye
Cole (OK) R OK legislator Aye
Crenshaw R FL legislator Aye
Cubin R WY legislator Aye
Davis, Tom R VA legislator Aye
Dreier R CA legislator Aye
Ehlers R MI legislator Aye
Emerson R MO legislator Aye
Everett R AL legislator Aye
Ferguson R NJ legislator Aye
Fossella R NY legislator Aye
Gilchrest R MD legislator Aye
Granger R TX legislator Aye
Herger R CA legislator Aye
Hobson R OH legislator Aye
Inglis (SC) R SC legislator Aye
King (NY) R NY legislator Aye
Kirk R IL legislator Aye
Kline (MN) R MN legislator Aye
LaHood R IL legislator Aye
Lewis (CA) R CA legislator Aye
Lewis (KY) R KY legislator Aye
Lungren, Daniel E. R CA legislator Aye
McCrery R LA legislator Aye
McHugh R NY legislator Aye
McKeon R CA legislator Aye
Miller, Gary R CA legislator Aye
Peterson (PA) R PA legislator Aye
Pickering R MS legislator Aye
Porter R NV legislator Aye
Pryce (OH) R OH legislator Aye
Putnam R FL legislator Aye
Radanovich R CA legislator Aye
Regula R OH legislator Aye
Reynolds R NY legislator Aye
Rogers (AL) R AL legislator Aye
Rogers (KY) R KY legislator Aye
Ryan (WI) R WI legislator Aye
Saxton R NJ legislator Aye
Sessions R TX legislator Aye
Shays R CT legislator Aye
Simpson R ID legislator Aye
Smith (TX) R TX legislator Aye
Souder R IN legislator Aye
Tancredo R CO legislator Aye
Upton R MI legislator Aye
Walden (OR) R OR legislator Aye
Walsh (NY) R NY legislator Aye
Weldon (FL) R FL legislator Aye
Wilson (NM) R NM legislator Aye
Wilson (SC) R SC legislator Aye
Wolf R VA legislator Aye
Abercrombie D HI legislator No
Altmire D PA legislator No
Baca D CA legislator No
Barrow D GA legislator No
Becerra D CA legislator No
Berkley D NV legislator No
Blumenauer D OR legislator No
Boyda (KS) D KS legislator No
Braley (IA) D IA legislator No
Butterfield D NC legislator No
Carney D PA legislator No
Carson D IN legislator No
Castor D FL legislator No
Cazayoux D LA legislator No
Chandler D KY legislator No
Childers D MS legislator No
Clay D MO legislator No
Cleaver D MO legislator No
Conyers D MI legislator No
Costello D IL legislator No
Courtney D CT legislator No
Cuellar D TX legislator No
Cummings D MD legislator No
Davis, Lincoln D TN legislator No
DeFazio D OR legislator No
Delahunt D MA legislator No
Doggett D TX legislator No
Edwards (MD) D MD legislator No
Filner D CA legislator No
Giffords D AZ legislator No
Gillibrand D NY legislator No
Green, Al D TX legislator No
Green, Gene D TX legislator No
Grijalva D AZ legislator No
Herseth Sandlin D SD legislator No
Hill D IN legislator No
Hinchey D NY legislator No
Hirono D HI legislator No
Hodes D NH legislator No
Holden D PA legislator No
Inslee D WA legislator No
Jackson (IL) D IL legislator No
Jackson-Lee (TX) D TX legislator No
Jefferson D LA legislator No
Johnson (GA) D GA legislator No
Kagen D WI legislator No
Kaptur D OH legislator No
Kilpatrick D MI legislator No
Kucinich D OH legislator No
Lampson D TX legislator No
Lee D CA legislator No
Lewis (GA) D GA legislator No
Lipinski D IL legislator No
Lynch D MA legislator No
Matheson D UT legislator No
McIntyre D NC legislator No
Michaud D ME legislator No
Mitchell D AZ legislator No
Napolitano D CA legislator No
Ortiz D TX legislator No
Pascrell D NJ legislator No
Pastor D AZ legislator No
Payne D NJ legislator No
Peterson (MN) D MN legislator No
Rodriguez D TX legislator No
Rothman D NJ legislator No
Roybal-Allard D CA legislator No
Rush D IL legislator No
Salazar D CO legislator No
Sanchez, Linda T. D CA legislator No
Sanchez, Loretta D CA legislator No
Schiff D CA legislator No
Scott (GA) D GA legislator No
Scott (VA) D VA legislator No
Serrano D NY legislator No
Shea-Porter D NH legislator No
Sherman D CA legislator No
Shuler D NC legislator No
Solis D CA legislator No
Stark D CA legislator No
Stupak D MI legislator No
Sutton D OH legislator No
Taylor D MS legislator No
Thompson (CA) D CA legislator No
Thompson (MS) D MS legislator No
Tierney D MA legislator No
Udall (CO) D CO legislator No
Udall (NM) D NM legislator No
Visclosky D IN legislator No
Walz (MN) D MN legislator No
Watson D CA legislator No
Welch (VT) D VT legislator No
Woolsey D CA legislator No
Wu D OR legislator No
Yarmuth D KY legislator No
Aderholt R AL legislator No
Akin R MO legislator No
Alexander R LA legislator No
Bachmann R MN legislator No
Barrett (SC) R SC legislator No
Bartlett (MD) R MD legislator No
Barton (TX) R TX legislator No
Biggert R IL legislator No
Bilbray R CA legislator No
Bilirakis R FL legislator No
Bishop (UT) R UT legislator No
Blackburn R TN legislator No
Boustany R LA legislator No
Broun (GA) R GA legislator No
Brown-Waite, Ginny R FL legislator No
Buchanan R FL legislator No
Burgess R TX legislator No
Burton (IN) R IN legislator No
Buyer R IN legislator No
Capito R WV legislator No
Carter R TX legislator No
Chabot R OH legislator No
Coble R NC legislator No
Conaway R TX legislator No
Culberson R TX legislator No
Davis (KY) R KY legislator No
Davis, David R TN legislator No
Deal (GA) R GA legislator No
Dent R PA legislator No
Diaz-Balart, L. R FL legislator No
Diaz-Balart, M. R FL legislator No
Doolittle R CA legislator No
Drake R VA legislator No
Duncan R TN legislator No
English (PA) R PA legislator No
Fallin R OK legislator No
Feeney R FL legislator No
Flake R AZ legislator No
Forbes R VA legislator No
Fortenberry R NE legislator No
Foxx R NC legislator No
Franks (AZ) R AZ legislator No
Frelinghuysen R NJ legislator No
Gallegly R CA legislator No
Garrett (NJ) R NJ legislator No
Gerlach R PA legislator No
Gingrey R GA legislator No
Gohmert R TX legislator No
Goode R VA legislator No
Goodlatte R VA legislator No
Graves R MO legislator No
Hall (TX) R TX legislator No
Hastings (WA) R WA legislator No
Hayes R NC legislator No
Heller R NV legislator No
Hensarling R TX legislator No
Hoekstra R MI legislator No
Hulshof R MO legislator No
Hunter R CA legislator No
Issa R CA legislator No
Johnson (IL) R IL legislator No
Johnson, Sam R TX legislator No
Jones (NC) R NC legislator No
Jordan R OH legislator No
Keller R FL legislator No
King (IA) R IA legislator No
Kingston R GA legislator No
Knollenberg R MI legislator No
Kuhl (NY) R NY legislator No
Lamborn R CO legislator No
Latham R IA legislator No
LaTourette R OH legislator No
Latta R OH legislator No
Linder R GA legislator No
LoBiondo R NJ legislator No
Lucas R OK legislator No
Mack R FL legislator No
Manzullo R IL legislator No
Marchant R TX legislator No
McCarthy (CA) R CA legislator No
McCaul (TX) R TX legislator No
McCotter R MI legislator No
McHenry R NC legislator No
McMorris Rodgers R WA legislator No
Mica R FL legislator No
Miller (FL) R FL legislator No
Miller (MI) R MI legislator No
Moran (KS) R KS legislator No
Murphy, Tim R PA legislator No
Musgrave R CO legislator No
Myrick R NC legislator No
Neugebauer R TX legislator No
Nunes R CA legislator No
Paul R TX legislator No
Pearce R NM legislator No
Pence R IN legislator No
Petri R WI legislator No
Pitts R PA legislator No
Platts R PA legislator No
Poe R TX legislator No
Price (GA) R GA legislator No
Ramstad R MN legislator No
Rehberg R MT legislator No
Reichert R WA legislator No
Renzi R AZ legislator No
Rogers (MI) R MI legislator No
Rohrabacher R CA legislator No
Ros-Lehtinen R FL legislator No
Roskam R IL legislator No
Royce R CA legislator No
Sali R ID legislator No
Scalise R LA legislator No
Schmidt R OH legislator No
Sensenbrenner R WI legislator No
Shadegg R AZ legislator No
Shimkus R IL legislator No
Shuster R PA legislator No
Smith (NE) R NE legislator No
Smith (NJ) R NJ legislator No
Stearns R FL legislator No
Sullivan R OK legislator No
Terry R NE legislator No
Thornberry R TX legislator No
Tiahrt R KS legislator No
Tiberi R OH legislator No
Turner R OH legislator No
Walberg R MI legislator No
Wamp R TN legislator No
Westmoreland R GA legislator No
Whitfield (KY) R KY legislator No
Wittman (VA) R VA legislator No
Young (AK) R AK legislator No
Young (FL) R FL legislator No
Weller R IL legislator Not Voting

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama; the Audacity of Change


In terms of the political climate and the current election cycle Barack Obama sounds like a man who is bitterly clinging to his message of change while losing his cool.

His poll numbers are dropping, his frustration is showing, swing states and even some traditionally blue states like New Jersey are moving toward McCain and the Obama campaign just cannot seem to overcome the McCain - Palin mania that is now sweeping the country.

As further evidence of this, yesterday while on the campaign stump Senator Barack Obama made the following comment in reference to John McCain out of general frustration...

"He is just now starting to talk about change, and here I have been on the campaign trail talking about change for two years."

You know what.... I agree with you Barack you are 100% correct... you HAVE been TALKING about change for two years.

So where is it Senator Obama where is the change you have promised us sir?

What have you actually DONE in the last two years other than talk?

Where is the legislation you have written?

The legislation you have proposed?

The committees you have run?

Where are the reform bills?

The bills you have passed?

The taxes you have cut?

The companies you have helped to build?

The jobs you have created?

The troops you have brought home?

The wars you have ended?

The terrorists you have stopped?

The children you have educated?

The crimes you have prevented?

The people you have healed?

The unity in your party?

The woman on your ticket?

Where Barack?

Where is any positive change that you have created for the good of the American people?

Please tell me what have you actually accomplished?

TALKING about change is EASY; it is another thing to being doing something about it!

Senator Barack Obama...a man of many words...

I am John Barnhart of www.barnhartblog.com, www.letsgetthisright.com, and Host of the John Barnhart Show on the Heading Right Radio Channel, and I approved this message!

     
Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebook outside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Investigators Turn Up Evidence of an Untold Sarah Palin Scandal


This is an important News Bulletin...

Govsar The Obama campaign, the drive-by media, and many liberal 527groups have sent thousands of folks into the Alaska wilderness searching for an untold Sarah Palin scandal in an attempt to derail the McCain - Palin ticket with an "October surprise".

For those who have not heard, here is the latest and trust me it is a shocker... Alaska Governor Sarah Palin had a tanning bed installed the Governor’s mansion.

I know what you are thinking, how could she... after we the people thought she was naturally tan and glowing all the time, but alas it is true. The Liberals have finally found a scandal that may stick.

After all, the American Cancer Society shuns the use of tanning beds and McCain himself has suffered from skin cancer! This scandalous story was first reported by Al Giodano's Narco News.

Apparently Governor Palin had it installed in the Governor’s mansion on her instruction, and a spokesman for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Roger Wetherell, confirmed the story which then made it onto several political news Blogs including Real Clear Politics and Politico.com.

Oh... just one more thing... Mr. Wetherell also confirmed that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin paid for the tanning bed with her own money!

Liberals As each of us know the "Dali-Bama" has informed each of us that we must give up our addictions to things like "oil, cars, guns, prosperity, our money and The Bible."

So, in order to help Sarah Palin with her "addiction to tanning beds and Vitamin D" the Obama campaign sent advance team of "Liberal Ambassadors" to Alaska.

The advance team has gathered outside the Governor's Mansion in Juneau where at this very moment they have encircled the mansion, are holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" in an effort to ward off evil spirits and Vitamin D.

They are hopeful that Barack Obama otherwise known as "The One" is soon to arrive on the scene as only the "Dali-Bama" can so he can levitate the Governor's mansion and remove the cancer causing tanning bed from the structure thereby saving the Governors life and exorcising the demon vitamin D from her body.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebook • outside.in: geotag this story • Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jesus Was A Community Organizer?

I saw this last Friday at A Tic In The Minds Eye and thought it might be approprite to reprise here.
Here is the original link http://a-tic-in-the-minds-eye.blogspot.com/
 
I've been hearing the comparison of Barak Obama with Jesus and Sarah Palin with Pontius Pilate lately coming from the fringe left. That "Jesus was a Community Organizer and Pilate was a governor" is a comment from a blogger on the Washington Post website, that liberal pundits and congressmen are now parroting in an attempt to be witty. Two things are obvious...one, they don't know Jesus, and two they don't know how offesive that is to believers.

Jesus is the saviour of the world. In fact the only example of him organizing anything is when he chose the apostles.

"And it came to pass in those days, that he went out into a mountain to pray: and he passed the whole night in the prayer of God. And when day was come, he called unto him his disciples: and he chose twelve of them (whom also he named apostles): Simon, whom he surnamed Peter, and Andrew his brother, James and John, Philip and Bartholomew, Matthew and Thomas, James the son of Alpheus, and Simon who is called Zelotes, And Jude the brother of James, and Judas Iscariot, who was the traitor. And coming down with them, he stood in a plain place: and the company of his disciples and a very great multitude of people from all Judea and Jerusalem and the sea coast, both of Tyre and Sidon, Who were come to hear him and to be healed of their diseases. And they that were troubled with unclean spirits were cured."
(Luk 6:12-18)

This act of "community organizing" changed the world. It very well could qualify Jesus to be president if he weren't already God.

posted by Joe S. at 9/12/2008 01:43:00 PM 0 Comments

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Can Already Hear the Libtards... "Hamdan Convicted of a Traffic Violation?"

 

New York Times - GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba — A panel of six military officers convicted a former driver for Osama bin Laden of a war crime Wednesday, completing the first military commission trial here and the first conducted by the United States since the end of World War II.

The tribunal convicted Salim Ahmed Hamdan of war crimes and supporting terrorism after a 10 day trial.

The article goes on to say "...the commission acquitted the former driver, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, of a conspiracy charge, arguably the more serious of two charges he faced. His conviction came on a separate but lesser charge of providing material support for terrorism.

I can hear it now, the Libtard comedians on the left like David Letterman, Jay Leno, John Stewart will undoubtedly start making fun of the Bush administration for convicting Hamdam for simply driving Osama around. No doubt that the Alphabet media will do the same or at least question if this makes the War on Terror a success or worth the effort at all.

Mark my words within less than 24 hours you will start to hear the following "all they can do is convict Hamdan for a simple traffic violation?" they will go public with their rhetoric questioning if Hamdan was a significant enough participant in Al-Quaeda's plans to even bother with in the first place.

Then if he does indeed get a life sentence for providing support to terrorists they will try to attack the Bush administration, McCain and conservatives by questioning “is housing him for a life sentence is worth the cost?" Mark my words, they are already developing the comedy material, the video satire and writing Op-Ed pieces for it and were probably working on them weeks ago before the trial started.

Don't forget folks, the man has no soul, he was caught carrying missiles with him in 2001 while fighting in Afghanistan, he knew about 9/11 before it happened, he helped Osama bin Laden with moving about, the transfer of weapons, materials, the movement and distribution of information, communication, and personnel.

I could care less if he was a big fish or a little one... when the Libtards start railing on the Bush administration for convicting Hamdan of “driving while stupid” it's worth remembering that he helped support this...

Embedded Video

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: 

 

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineAdd to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Audacity of Obama; Guilt by Association

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com

No series written about Barack Obama would be complete without an expose regarding the most controversial of his closest advisers, friends and mentors.

WARNING - some of the video material contained in this article is unedited from its original compiled version and it may contain language or comments that some may find objectionable.

First up, let's review the religious beliefs of one of Barack Obama's best friends, his biggest endorser, she is a world renowned actress and talk show host; she is a former member of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, and holds herself up to be a "born again Christian" her name is Oprah Winfrey. For those who are not Christians or are not familiar with the Christian religion this video may mean little or nothing to you. To Christians, this video is very likely something you have never heard before and if so, I expect it will open your eyes to the truth about Oprah Winfrey and her new age beliefs.

The second group of Barack Obama's friends I want to expose to the light of truth are the 1960's radicals who have come out and openly supported him as an Illinois Senator, a US Senator and Presidential candidate. They include William Ayers, his wife Bernadine Dohrn, other former members of the Weather Underground,The Black Panthers, Jane Fonda, etc.

If you would like to see the other 8 parts of this video series about the Weather Underground (The Weather Underground 1 to 9) they are all available on YouTube.

Granted, Barack Obama was less than 10 years old when many 1960's militants were nearing the height of their activism, being disruptive and conducting criminal acts like bombings. When Barack Obama decided to become a politician he made the decision to align himself with radical Marxist activists, he could have chosen not to, but he didn't. He began his campaign for Senate in the home of Bill Ayers, he served on the Woods Foundation Board with the man and he helped to approve donations Woods Foundation donations to Bernadine Dorhn's "study activities" at the University where she teaches.

Mr Ayers and his wife have trampled all over the constitution, the rights of others to live free and even though they were acquitted on criminal charges from their activities in the 1`960's they freely admit to their part in bombings that killed and injured several people, to this day they are very unrepentant about the subject. Obama should know better then to associate himself with thugs like these. They represent the lowest common denominator in our society.

When it comes to radical view points on race and religion few people hold a candle to Nation of Islam leader, Minister Louis Farrakhan. The Nightline video of Louis Farrakhan Raw provides some insight into his heart, his mind and his closely held beliefs.

Just as interesting as Louis Farrakhan's comments is a video of Barack Obama tripping all over himself as he searches for an answer to a question from Tim Russert about Louis Farrakhan endorsing him. At the time Obama was still a member of Trinity United Church of Christ where his friend and mentor of over 20 years had given an award to Minister Farrakhan for his leadership. Farrakhan himself once said "to Black People I am the Pope" assuming that all blacks listened to and follow him in the same way Catholics revere the Pope. Is it any surprise in the video below Obama stops far short of denouncing Farrakhan, he appears to be afraid of the impact it might have on his base of support.

After watching this video courtesy of NBC is it any wonder why Obama has yet to debate John McCain with 100 days left before the election? Take the teleprompter away from Obama and he becomes just another socialist squirrel leaping from branch to branch in search of a safe hole to crawl into and hide.

I could dedicate a huge amount of time on www.barnhartblog.com to Obama's very close adviser, friend, mentor and pastor Jeremiah Wright; instead I thought it best to post several videos of the controversial reverend and simply remind everyone that this is a man who Barack Obama claims he never knew held these controversial views.

For 20 plus years he was a friend of Obama's and presumably still is. Obama has never answered the American people as to why he became so close to a man with such tragically slanted and unrealistic views.

In reading Obama's books I think the reason is in part because Obama himself still privately clings to many of the same stereotypical negative views about this country and other people, and I fail to see how Barack Obama can help remove the splinter of racism from America's eye when the man still has a beam in his own.


I hope these video segments provoke thought and stir you to question the truth about Barack Obama's personal associations with secular humanists, Marxists, anti-semites, and hate mongers. I encourage you to watch the video's again and ask yourself, "is this the kind of American I want to be President of the United States?"

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Audacity of Obama; the New Messiah

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com
 

Messiahglowing If you thought my last article regarding the Audacity of Obama and his lack of action in regards to race relations and “sundown towns” in Illinois was politically enlightening, this article travels well beyond common politics. It is a must read for anyone who has questions about Barack Obama and some of the conflicting statements he has made. It also touches on one of the most controversial subjects surrounding Barack Obama, one that I have to admit completely stunned me.

First, let’s hit the political subject matter…

Most television broadcasters, reporters and comedians are maintaining a hands-off approach in regards to analyzing the words and deeds of Barack Obama. Most of them will not touch the subject of his gaffes and mistakes; it is as if he is the “new Messiah” and anything he says or does is perfectly acceptable.

After interviewing staffers from Leno, Letterman, Conan and other late night shows a new story in Time magazine came to the same conclusion. The staffers admitted they do not want to write comedy about Obama because he is so popular and attacking him will cause their ratings to slide. Commentator Lou Dobbs of CNN has suggested that everyone is avoiding questioning Obama because they are afraid that accusations of racism will follow. Regardless of the reason, Obama is being treated as if he is the “new Messiah” so I have to ask, would the Messiah tell lies like these?

Example One: Obama has lied about his personal inspiration

During the campaign and in his book “Dreams from my Father” Obama has recalled an article and photograph in Life magazine that made a huge impression on him when he was a youngster living in Jakarta. The article told the story a man who was black and used chemicals to peel and lighten his skin to try and fit in. When conservatives began researching the story questions surfaced as to the legitimacy of the story and the existence of the picture that made the impression on a young Barack. Historians at Life magazine could not locate the article or photo. Obama then said it “might have been Time or Ebony”, but again, historians from those magazines were unable to locate any such article or photograph and no magazine has stepped forward to confirm the story.

Example Two: Obama has lied about campaign ads

During the primary an anti-Clinton video went viral on the internet that was a doctored version of a historic Apple Macintosh advertisement based on George Orwell’s 1984. When questioned by CNN’s Larry King about the ad Barack Obama said "We don't have the technical capacity to create something like that." Unfortunately for Obama the truth is the ad was made by a political operative who was paid to help keep his website updated. The operative made the ad at home on his Mac and it was well known by the Obama camp who produced the ad and when.

Obamasflagpin Example Three: Obama has lied about his wearing of the American Flag

During the campaign Barack Obama defended his right to avoid wearing an American Flag lapel pin by saying “You know, the truth is that right after 9/11, I had a pin. Shortly after 9/11, particularly because as we’re talking about the Iraq war, that became a substitute for I think true patriotism, which is speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security, I decided I won’t wear that pin on my chest.” However in the past few days, prior to his visit to Iraq he is suddenly wearing the American Flag on his lapel again in an effort to reinvent himself as a pro-military patriot.

 Example Four: Obama has lied about his position on the surge in Iraq

Conservativecartoonb2Prior to and during the campaign Barack Obama has continually advocated the removal of troops from Iraq and was even quoted on his website as saying “the surge will not work, it is doomed to fail.” As an example on January 14, 2007 during an interview on CBS Obama said this “we can send 15,000 more troops 20,000 more troops or even 30,000 more troops and I don’t know any expert on the region or any military officer that I have spoken to privately that believes that is gonna [going to] make a substantial difference on the situation on the ground.”

Once General David Petraeus confirmed to Congress the surge was working, Obama had this to say January 1, 2008 in an interview on ABC “I had no doubt when I opposed the surge that given how wonderfully our troops perform that if we placed 30,000 more troops in there then we would see an improvement and the security situation would improve and we would see a reduction in the violence.”

Example Five: Obama is covering up his position about the surge in Iraq

In a stunning turn of events instead of admitting that he, Barack Obama, was wrong about the surge in Iraq the Associated Press reported today that over the weekend Obama’s staffers scurried to remove any and all negative quotes and references in reference to the surge not working in Iraq. They deny that it is because he is about to travel to Iraq and wants to position himself as a pro-military patriot.

Example Six: Barack Obama has lied about his position regarding health care

In 2003 while speaking before a meeting of the AFL/CIO Barack Obama made this statement “I happen to be a proponent of single-payer universal healthcare coverage. That’s what I’d like to see.” During a Democrat primary debate Hillary Clinton took Obama to task for his comment and Obama said this "I never said that we should try to go ahead and get single-payer."

Example Seven: Barack Obama has lied about off shore drilling platforms causing mass pollution

Barack Obama has said “offshore drilling will drain our natural resources and lead to more oil pollution on this nations shores” but Obama’s comments are incorrect. Scientists have proven that offshore oil platforms create artificial reefs, and professional fisherman confirmed that some of the very best fishing is in and around offshore drilling platforms due to the warmth. The effect is very similar to the one scientists discovered in Alaska when they studied the impact of oil pipelines on the mating habits of caribou and other animals. As to Obama’s comments regarding oil pollution in the ocean, The University of Santa Barbara, The National Academy of Sciences and other scientists studying the matter have determined that 63% of all oil seepage is natural and comes from the ocean floor, 4% is from transportation, 32% is caused by consumers dumping petroleum illegally and just 1%is caused by offshore platforms. They have also determined that offshore drilling helps to relieve the natural pressure on the earth to produce seepage.

Obama070423_1_560Example Eight: Barack Obama arrogantly sees himself as the “new Messiah”

Believe it or not Barack Obama staffers and Obama himself is not shying away from claims that he is the “new Messiah.” Before anyone doubts the claim I am making they might want to research the number of people comparing him to the Messiah, research his own comments that blasphemously draw on religious imagery and the number of stories that are circulating about people being healed during his speeches.

Barack Obama has said the following statements about himself and his political movement during several stump speeches “we are the change that we seek” and “we are the ones we have waited for.”

On January 8, 2008 while at Dartmouth Obama said this about himself “"My job this morning is to be so persuasive that a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Barack Obama."

Oabam_faithWhile on the stump Obama staffers have eluded that the questioning and persecution of Obama is like that of Jesus Christ.

Ginny McCallum a 43 year old woman who was confined to a wheel chair attended an Obama speech at The University of Texas. After bumping into Obama in a breezeway Barack Obama saw her, reached out to her, grabbed her hand, and then pulled her up to a standing position. Barack Obama smiled at her and said “Yes, you can” and she was healed. One staffer said that while people are in line to meet Barack they are healed “We don’t talk about it a lot, but yeah, it does happen. We don’t know exactly how or why it’s happening, and the Senator won’t talk about it. He usually insists that people keep it quiet and just report it to their pastor or priest."

While in Houston Texas Barack Obama stepped into the crowd and began reaching out to people with infirmities behind a rope line. He touched a cancer patient, a blind woman, a deaf man and they were reportedly healed after he simply said “yes you can.”

Obama insiders have said that they cannot explain it and they are told by the candidate to avoid identifying themselves. One aide to the campaign did say under the assurance of anonymity "His power goes beyond simple inspiration, there is something developing here that I’m not sure any of us fully understand. We were told privately that his time has not yet come, so it would be inappropriate to talk about the healings right now. He says he will wait until the convention to speak publicly about the special calling he believes he has to lead the country.”

When I discovered these and other references on the Internet I was stunned. Yet there the stories were of Obama laying hands on people simply saying the phrase “yes you can” and people were being healed. No mention of God, Jesus, power from heaven, etc. Barack Obama is apparently healing people of his own accord.

Christians, Jews, Muslims and non-believers can research the subject for themselves by looking up the phrases “Obama heals”, “Obama yes you can” and “is Obama healing people” etc.

ObamamessiahI had to change the search requirements multiple times to dig through similar websites with the same information to find different stories confirming the phenomenon. I also searched websites that commonly expose false internet rumors such as Snopes.com; but I was unable to locate even one that debunked rumors of miracles being performed by Barack Obama or that were happening at his speeches.

I do know that the story has made it to a political satire website called "The Lark" which is much like "The Onion" and "The Peoples Cube" but even so, after making calls to the Obama campaign no one would confirm or deny the rumors. Frankly, I wished they would because the rumors are troublesome.

As a Christian who supports Israel and believes in the second coming of Jesus Christ, all I can say is if the rumors of Barack Obama healing people by saying simply “yes you can” are indeed true, any man healing people of his own accord is frightening. I believe in the power of prayer, miracles and healing but Christians are supposed to be on guard against anyone performing miracles and wonders based on their own power.

I created www.barnhartblog.com to discuss politics, current events and sometimes religion, but the discoveries made while researching this piece were stunning and have troubled me greatly. As a Christian I dare not make any statements as to what they might mean with respect to apocalyptic Biblical prophecy, and nor should anyone else. Only God knows the answer and I prefer to leave those matters in his capable hands.

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is the Strategy of the McCain Campaign

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com
 

21mccainOver the past several months the McCain campaign has taken a ton of heat for the way they have handled the campaign. Some of the criticism has come from political analysts on the left but most of it has come from conservatives on the right. Laura Ingraham, Dick Morris, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and many others including me have questioned what the heck is going on; why has the McCain camp not gone on the attack, why have they ignored the conservative right, why are they courting the middle and the left?

What everyone wants to know if this; is the McCain campaign staff is totally off their rocker or is there some method to their madness? Are they out of touch with reality or is there a good reason why they have not called out Obama for his inconsistencies, for his insulting elitism, for his anti-American rhetoric, for his tax policies, his policies on energy, etc.?

Well, in my opinion the only reasonable deductions to make are these; either the McCain camp knew how to win the nomination but not the election and he is truly the next Bob Dole OR their strategy is as follows;

1.       Remain civil prior to the convention.

2.       Let the liberal media’s bias towards Obama take shape until it becomes extremely obvious and is called out and rejected. ***NOTE: Lou Dobbs of CNN called out and exposed the obvious bias last week on his show. Prior to that Saturday Night Live called attention to it

3.       Allow Obama to stay in the spotlight while he continues to make anti-conservative statements

4.       Allow Obama to continue to move away from his previous positions of getting the troops out of Iraq, not supporting FISA, being ant-gun, etc. As he moves to the center he will disillusion the voters who took Obama to be a “different kind of politician.”

5.       During this time McCain can afford to make a few minor mistakes because the focus will not be on him it will be on Obama.

6.       During the time between now and the convention the McCain camp can focus on moderate and independent voters and pick up as many of them as possible.

7.       At the convention, McCain can announce the selection of a very conservative politician, a well liked moderate with a more conservative record than his or an inspirational personality such as Colin Powell, or even former EBay CEO Meg Whitman to be his Vice-Presidential running mate.

8.       Allow Obama to beat himself and when he is down, then put the heat on by announcing the methods to balancing the budget, removing the troops from Iraq, and the development of an America First energy policy.

John_mccain_mackinac_island_2 Based on my own perspective of what it may take to beat Obama and what both campaigns are doing right now this seems to be the only plausible reason for the present postion of the McCain campaign. Either his advisors are completely inept or their strategy is similar to what I have outlined.

The McCain camp has to connect with the general public, with ordinary people who are paying high prices for food and gas, he has to connect with people who have lost their jobs or are living in fear of it, he has to connect with the middle-class voters that are sick of our country borrowing money from the Red Chinese to prop up our economy. If that is the strategy of the McCain camp, McCain will be the next President, if it isn’t heaven help us when a Marxist like Obama takes the oath of office.

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Wit and Wisdom of President Ronald Reagan

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Military Service and the Presidency; Why General Wesley Clark is Wrong

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com

1756_wesley_clark Since the start of the 2008 Presidential election cycle a cloud of controversy has existed on the Internet in regards to John McCain’s war record. Whispers about the subject were heard when McCain ran for the Republican nomination previously but when he lost the nomination to George Bush, nothing came of it.

Last Sunday while appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer, former 2004 Presidential candidate and Hillary Clinton supporter turned Obama adviser; General Wesley Clark (Ret.) brought the subject into the spotlight by questioning whether or not military experience qualifies a person to be President.

Clark's comments tossed gasoline onto a subject that has remained dormant in the media for most of the year while Bloggers have debated it in a very heated manner.

Since John McCain is the target of the controversy I thought it best to outline the 4 schools of thought in regards to his military service and they are as follows;

1.   Many left leaning political analysts, pundits and Bloggers question the “fairness” of McCain's campaign using his military experience to validate his character and qualifications, especially since the two most likely Democrat nominees, Clinton and Obama, lacked any military experience.

2.   John McCain’s supporters contend that his military service, his time as a P.O.W., his medals and military leadership experience easily qualify him as a war hero and that McCain should use his military service to his full advantage during the campaign

.

3.   Then there are a few on both the far-right and the far-left who insist that McCain is a traitor because while in captivity and under extreme duress he revealed his mission, he signed documents for the North Vietnamese which were used to certify him as a war criminal and those documents were used as propaganda tools against the US government and other P.O.W.'s. Because of those actions some have gone so far as to say McCain is no different than actress, protester and Communist sympathizer Jane Fonda.
 

4.   Finally, there are those on who acknowledge McCain’s service but say it in no way qualifies him to be Commander-in-Chief.

What follows is my personal commentary on the matter…

A)  The first school of thought is absolutely stupid and only an idiot with Socialist or Marxist views would make such a suggestion. No person with half a brain should ever suggest that a candidate not discuss their military experience simply because it might not be fair to other candidates who don’t.
 

B)   John McCain has every right to discuss his military service in an open and honest fashion. His campaign should talk about it openly so voters get a much better sense of how his military service shaped his character

.

C)   I get “McCain is a traitor” emails every week from loud mouths on both sides; I receive them from Obama supporters who use it to excuse Obama’s Marxism, the former John Kerry supporters use it as “pay-back” for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth attacking Kerry in 2004 for his controversial war record and testimony before congress in the 70’s, and then there are the far out conspiracy nuts who think the C.I.A. killed Kennedy in 1963 and have run a puppet government ever since.

All three of those nitwit types need a swift kick in the behind. I dare say that none of them could stand the kind of pain and mental anguish McCain endured in North Vietnam. Every human has a mental, physical, spiritual and emotional breaking point, McCain reached his after years of horrible abuse, torture and neglect. I can't begin to imagine what John McCain survived.
 

The only people who have even the slightest reason to hold a grudge against McCain are those who were strong enough to endure an equal or greater amount of torture in the Hanoi Hilton but never signed a propaganda statement. Only God truly knows what those men went through, that said, those few who hold a grudge against McCain should make efforts to temper any comments with wisdom, humility and compassion. They need to remember that after McCain finally did break after four straight days of torture he resisted any further temptations despite efforts to the contrary. His stubborn resistance landed him in solitary confinement for two years

.

D)  Those who say they respect McCain’s military service but do not recognize it as a valid Presidential character trait should review American history.
 

Mccain_flagWe have had 43 Presidents, 31 served in the military prior to being President; 30 were officers, 24 served in the US Army or a state militia, 6 were in the Navy, 1 was in the Air Force. Of the 31 Presidents with military experience only 1, Thomas Jefferson, served at a time when the US was not involved in a conflict of some kind. For those keeping score, even Franklin Roosevelt served this country in a civilian capacity as Secretary of the Navy during World War I, counting his service he would be number 32. Of the 11 remaining Presidents with no record of military service, historians generally agree that 6 of them represent administrations which either under-achieved on their stated goals, left office under a cloud of scandal or both

.

Buscar With that said, I concede that military service is not a prerequisite for President and it is not a predictor of success or failure, some Presidents with military experience are considered to be unsuccessful in achieving their full potential.

Democrats would likely point to the current Bush administration’s unfavorable ratings in regards to oil prices, the lack of economic stability, the money spent on Iraq, and the failure to find and kill Osama Bin Laden.

On the other hand Republicans would likely point to Jimmy Carter as an example of a woefully poor Democrat President because of his mishandling of the Iran hostage crisis, the dismantling of the military and his short sighted economic policies.

I believe there are three reasons why so many American Presidents have had military experience.

1.  Americans recognize that all were willing to pay the ultimate sacrifice if needed.
 

2.  Americans believe the military is an excellent place for a person to observe, learn and practice leadership skills.
 

3.  Americans believe that candidates with military experience will take the oath to defend the nation seriously and will not hesitate to use America’s military if necessary.
 

Seal_2When Wesley Clark said on Sunday "I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to become president" he not only discounted John McCain’s military service, he discounted his own military service, the service of millions of veterans, and he discounted the military service of 31 Presidents as if it has no value at all.

Military service is a common experience shared by 74% of American Presidents, anyone who ignores that historical fact and places no value in it is simply in denial.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Latest Liberal Strategy; I'm Rubber You're Glue!

Originally published at www.barnhartblog.com

Practically everyone has said it at one time or another when they were a child in the midst of a confrontation; in the sandbox, at recess, or on the playground..."Nananana booboo, stick your head in doodoo, I'm rubber you're glue, anything you say bounces off me and sticks to you!"

What sounded okay when I was 5 or 6 would sound a bit ridiculous if I were to say it at age 40 while in the middle of a political discussion; but that is exactly what liberals are doing in this age of political correctness. Liberals are in the midst of conducting a war of words based on childish ideas in an effort to paint conservatives as out of touch, greedy, racist and evil.
 

Bjs1_3 Just today I received an email from yet another Democrat Massachusetts State Representative with a negative reaction to my Blog. Representative Benjamin Swan read my Blog about Obama arrogantly creating his own version of the Presidential seal for use on the campaign trail and then responded by calling me “small-minded.”
 

What I cannot figure out is if Massachusetts State Representative Benjamin Swan called me “small minded” because I think what Obama did was arrogant, because I am conservative, or because Massachusetts State Representative Benjamin Swan is trying to insinuate that my comments about Obama’s arrogance are racially motivated.

Matt_patrick_3 Last week Democrat Massachusetts State Representative Matthew Patrick responded by not only incorrectly stating that right wing conservatives have controlled the country for the last 30 years, but then bashed southern states by saying… “the southern states that lead in every negative category there is."
 

Of course I sent both of them emails asking them to clarify their comments, because one seemed to be playing the race card, while the other appears to reveal anti-southern hostility. They have not responded so I will be calling their offices in an effort to try and get them to do so. These two incidents are not isolated, they just happen to be from liberal Democrats who are Massachusetts State Representatives. Classy isn't it?
 

As a conservative Blogger I get hate mail every day from people who constantly are preaching about civility and tolerance, but then practice neither.
 

Take a few minutes to scan through www.huffingtonpost.com sometime, the amount of rude and filthy trash talking there goes far beyond the regular name calling and satire that should be on a "professional" political Blog.
 

Personal attacks are nothing new; when conservatives call the philosophy, judgment, broken-promises, policies, actions and inaction of liberals into question via editorials, talk radio, cable news, or the alternative media (like Blogs) liberals will immediately go on the attack demonizing their target in a suggestive manner.
 

Here are some other great examples:

Ronreagan1_4 May 13, 2008 MSNBC commentator Ron Reagan Jr. is asked by Chris Matthews to provide his thoughts on Obama losing to Hillary Clinton in West Virginia, his response was “I think the better question to ask is what is wrong with West Virginians?”
 

Imagine that, an ultra-liberal attacking moderates and more conservative blue-dog Democrats for thinking and believing the way they want to instead of endorsing the candidate he thinks they should.

Where are the tolerance, unity and inclusiveness in that?
 

Don't West Virginians have the right to support who they prefer, or must they all bend their knees and pledge support to who the left coast liberals tell them they must?
 

That very same night MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews made a similar comment “you could have predicted the outcome on this one 20 years ago…” both of them snickering afterwards.
 

What they were suggesting but aren’t brave enough to come out and say plainly is that West Virginians voted in favor of Hillary Clinton instead of Barack Obama because they are either (take your pick) uneducated, inbred, or racist; yet another classy stereotype from those self-absorbed wind bags.
 

Schrismatthewslarge_2 Chris Matthews is famous for saying that when he hears Barack Obama speak he "feels a thrill going up his leg"; what Chris Matthews doesn't realize is that when Barack Obama speaks conservatives feel something too; it's Barack "Tax-Man" Obama reaching into our pockets and we aren't exactly thrilled about it. That is why we don't support the man.


Liberal commentators are not the only ones getting into the act, oh no... Barack Obama has use his mild mannered speechifying to express the same racially charged sentiments.

Cn_obama_dw_politik_171960g_4 April 12, 2008 San Francisco, California Barack Obama made this statement about gun owners and Christians “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them…And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
 

Many in the media have focused solely on the “guns and religion” portion of Barack Obama’s quote; however, when taken in total his comment suggests that  someone who has lost their job might take their frustration out on an immigrant by shooting them and then using their religious beliefs or economic situation  to justify it.

Tb_obama_450_3 June 20, 2008 Jacksonville, Florida at a Democrat fundraiser Barack Obama himself plays the race card when he makes the following statements in reference to the kind of campaign Republicans were going to run against him. "We know what kind of campaign they're going to run. They're going to try to make you afraid. They're going to try to make you afraid of me. He's young and inexperienced and he's got a funny name. And did I mention he's black? We know the strategy because they've already shown their cards. Ultimately I think the American people recognize that old stuff hasn't moved us forward. That old stuff just divides us.”

What Barack Obama and others on the ultra-left are doing is placing everyone who disagrees with Barack Obama’s Marxist beliefs into one group and labeling them as racists and bigots. Quite a surprising strategy from a man who claimed he was going to transform politics and the nation; "We're going to reshape America in a way that is less mean-spirited and more generous."
 

Uh… yeah right… sure he is… by calling conservatives racists for disagreeing with his Marxist philosophy and politics Barack Obama isn’t providing “Change We Can Believe In” but he does represent change... “Change We Can’t Trust.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Massachusetts State Representative Matthew Patrick Ridicules Southern States

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com


Like many Bloggers I recently started sending material from my Blog to politicians of all parties. As a result I often receive email responses about my Blog commentary.

This week I sent an email about how Barack Obama had decided to create his own version of the Presidential Seal and how I saw it as evidence of his perceived arrogance. I personally don't care for his politics but if you do that is fine. His politics is something that my best friend and I debate all the time but we are still best friends despite our political differences. A link to the full Blog on the subject is located here - http://www.barnhartblog.com/barnhart_blog/2008/06/barack-obama-as.html

After sending my Blog-mail one of the responses I received was from State Representative Matthew Patrick of Massachusetts. Based on his response Mr. Patrick, a liberal Democrat, obviously didn't care much for my commentary but his response also reveals his reckless disregard for historical facts and blatant anti-southern bias. His email is detailed below. Pay close attention to his last statement.

 

M_p1_3 From: Patrick, Matthew - Rep. (HOU) [Matthew.Patrick@state.ma.us]

Wed 6/25/2008 8:59 AM

"John, Do me a favor and save your right wing rhetoric for the people who will believe it.  The right wing reactionaries have made a mess of this country for the past 30 years.  Anyone who wants to see the full impact of their governing philosophy need only look to the southern states that lead in every negative category there is."

 

I guess Mr. Patrick didn’t use the same history books the rest of America does. According to my calculations right wing conservatives have not controlled the US for the last 75 years much less the last 30.

Apparently Massachusetts Representative Matthew Patrick has somehow selectively forgotten his American history or the educational system in his state is behind the curve. Democrats controlled The White House, Congress and the Supreme Court from the 1930's until 1980 and there were just four Republican Presidents during that fifty year time span; Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford and Reagan and at no time in all those years did the Republican Party control Congress.

During Reagan’s two terms and George H.W. Bush's one term the majority of congressional seats were still held by Democrats. That continued to be the case until the middle of the Clinton years when Republicans finally took over the majority in 1994 which lasted until 2006 during George Bush's second term, a total of 12 years.

Perhaps Massachusetts State Representative Matthew Patrick's recollection of history and his math would improve were he to have attended public school in the south. Apparently these kinds of comments and radical behavior is nothing new for Mr. Patrick, I did some research on him and apparently he has a reputation for being rude to people. In fact, he gained some amount of notoriety in Massachusetts for being blatantly hostile to witnesses during testimony regarding discussion of a mandatory homosexual education bill.

I doubt very much if people from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, the Carolina's,  Mississippi and Louisiana (where they are still digging out from Katrina) or my home state of Texas would care too much for Representative Patrick trashing our region of the country if they were to read about it. We are God fearing, we are patriotic, we work hard, we pay our fair share of taxes, we support a large number of military personnel in our region and a great number of people from our states have fought and died for this country.

Politics aside perhaps Massachusetts State Representative Matthew Patrick would like to explain his comments and obvious anti-southern hostility.

Perhaps Massachusetts State Representative Matthew Patrick would like to explain to Barack Obama’s campaign and southern voters why he thinks it is okay to trash a part of the country Obama is trying to win in November?

Does Massachusetts State Representative Matthew Patrick not like southerners for some reason?

If you would like to contact Representative Patrick in regards to his apparent hostility towards southerners he can be reached here;

State House

District Office

Room 540

24 Collins Road

State House

P.O. Box 3252

Boston, MA 02133

Falmouth, MA 02536

Telephone: 617-722-2090

508-540-6308

Facsimile: 617-722-2848

E-mail: Rep.MatthewPatrick@hou.state.ma.us

RepMattP@Cape.com

 

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Common Sense Makes a Mockery of Global Warming and Climate Change

Image002_ice_age_2 In the 1970’s, while the rest of the world was waiting for “the next ice age” predicted by scientists in the 1960's, NASA Scientist James Hansen and three of his colleagues were investigating the impact that humans might have on climate change, specifically global warming.  During his study Hansen concluded that the world needed to brace itself for a cycle of global warming brought on by man-made pollution.

James Hansen is an award winning scientist and author with B.A degrees in physics, mathematics and astronomy. Hansen leads the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, he has taught at The University of Iowa, and Columbia in New York, he is heavily involved in earth science studies and he is interested in climatology as a sideline.

Hanseningreencap_2 In 1981 one of his research papers was published in Science magazine, in that paper Hansen concluded that Co2 contributes to global warming and that carbon emissions would lead to global warming sooner than he had previously predicted in the 1970’s.

Climatologists had already predicted that a trend would be apparent by 2020, but Hansen was saying in 1981 that the change was already occurring and that there would be record high temperatures as early as 1990.

Soon after his paper was published in Science magazine many environmental activists, liberal think tanks, and hundreds of media outlets began predicting the end of the world. They started talking about giant holes in the ozone layer, glaciers melting, terrible droughts due to global warming, world-wide famines, and predicted that world war three would be fought over fertile, usable land, access to water, and food; they sighted the famine and war in Ethiopia as evidence of Hansen’s theory being fact.

2199607950059023915fdfard_ph_2 19 years passed and after no world-wide droughts, famines or world wars had taken place Hansen jumped back into the media spotlight by publishing new findings in 2000.

In that paper, “Global Warming in the Twenty-First Century: an Alternative Scenario”, Hansen claimed that if humans focused on fossil fuel emissions of “greenhouse gases” and Co2 in the short term they could avoid tragedy.

Of course Hansen neglected to mention in his 2000 findings that the world had already somehow managed to side step tragedy for almost 20 years before he needlessly resurfaced to predict the end was just around the corner.

In 2003 Hansen resurfaced yet again with a new paper entitled “Can We Defuse the Global Warming Time Bomb.” In that paper Hansen first excused his previous incorrect predictions by saying that the stability of the Antarctic and Greenland glaciers had helped keep the planet cool in the face of rising Co2 levels, then Hansen expanded his position on global warming by saying "halting global warming requires urgent, unprecedented international cooperation, but the needed actions are feasible and have additional benefits for human health, agriculture and the environment."

Icca_logo_2 If Hansen’s views and predictions don’t seem extreme, consider his testimony this week before a congressional committee on climate change where he stated that anyone who disagreed with his theories in regards to Co2, global warming, greenhouse gases and climate change, were not only wrong but deserved to be put on trial and “tried for crimes against humanity.”

So let me get this straight, if anyone disagrees with James Hansen’s opinion on global warming and Co2 they should be put on trial for “crimes against humanity” …that is just stupid!

James Hansen is not now and never was a certified meteorologist or a certified climatologist who makes their living from studying the weather and historic weather patterns. He was and is an earth sciences teacher who works for NASA at an institute that studies astronomy. The study of climatology was for him originally nothing more than a topic of interest. He has since turned it into a business and some are starting to think his motivations are no longer self-less.

Liar2 In fact, Hansen has come under heavy criticism for providing conflicting sworn testimony before congress in regards to global warming back in 1989. To excuse that mistake in judgment Hansen claims part of his testimony was not actually his.

Okay…then would the rocket scientist please explain how someone else’s words ended up in his sworn testimony?

Hansen has also come under fire for creating climate modeling for his global warming studies that not only didn’t include proper scientific control data but also used faulty temperature readings from 1934 to the present. Hansen claimed the earth was warming when according to NASA reports it was actually cooling slightly. Amazingly the earth’s current median high temperature limits have dropped over the last 5 years, but that is something Hansen avoids discussing because it defeats his efforts to gain personal credibility and money. Hansen has had hundreds of thousands of dollars awarded to him for his study on climate change and his benefactors include prominent Democrats Al Gore and John Kerry via the Heinz foundation.

Perhaps those contributions would explain his being buddy-buddy with the liberal left and his support of their radical thinking in regards to climate taxes.

Hansen helped make the concept of greenhouse gases, greenhouse effect and Co2 emissions household phrases back in the 1980’s, the problem is that most of the gases he refers to as greenhouse like Co2, nitrogen and methane are natural to the environment and are not predominantly man made.

Greenhouse_2 The greenhouse effect is not correct in its description. The regulation of heat in a greenhouse is accomplished by a method known as convection and it involves either opening a floor, ceiling or window panel until the internal temperatures are optimal for plant life compared to the ambient outside air and temperature.

The earth regulates the radiation produced by man, animals, forest fires, volcanoes, and decaying matter via the natural life cycle involving the atmosphere, the vacuum in space, the ocean cycles, and the trade off of oxygen between plants and humans.

For those who don’t know here is the general make up of the air we breathe.
Nitrogen (N2): 78.09% Oxygen (O2): 20.95% Argon (Ar): 0.93% Carbon dioxide (CO2): 0.038% Others (less than 0.002% each): Neon (Ne), Helium (He), Krypton (Kr), Hydrogen (H2), Xenon (Xe).

Hansen has perpetrated one of the largest hoax’s known to modern man. There is not a deadly Co2 blanket that coats the earth’s atmosphere trapping extensive heat, methane and nitrogen underneath it as Hansen has predicted. Most of the air we breathe is not Co2 it is Nitrogen. If there were such a C02 blanket NASA and other high resolution satellites would reveal it the same way they reveal the gas clouds on other planets like Jupiter. Not to mention, that there are methods of making Co2 visible and to date none of them have revealed Hansen’s dangerous cloud hovering over the earth.

If it did exist an enormous cloud would be trapping excessive levels of Co2, nitrogen, methane, hydrogen, helium and other gases underneath it and people would be choking to death and falling over dead everyday by the thousands because of it.

Monsters_inc_500 It is a medical fact that a lack of oxygen to the brain will cause death or at a bare minimum permanent brain damage…so if nothing else according to Hansen’s theory there should be millions of brain dead people in the United States.

On second thought maybe there is some truth to Hansen’s theory…perhaps the reason why liberals believe in global warming is because they are the only ones affected by it.

Like I said, common sense makes a mockery of global warming and climate change every

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Income Redistribution Saves the Day

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com

 

Foreclosure1 Losing a home is very traumatic, it puts a strain on the entire family, the man of the house beats himself up over it, the marriage becomes strained, the kids don’t understand why they have to move, relatives become a safety net, etc. It’s sad.

Families that lose their home have a very tough time, often there is no one there to bail them out and pay their mortgage for them. They might receive help from relatives to get back on their feet but that is it. They file bankruptcy or don’t and go into years of debt; they become renters until they can start saving the necessary funds to finally buy a home again. There is no government bail out to save the day.

This morning prior to leaving for work I heard that the US Senate was going to debate the validity of the “Emergency Foreclosure Rescue Bill.” Sounds like a good thing, no one wants to see an old couple on a fixed income, the family of a disabled US veteran or someone out of work due to no fault of their own tossed out of their home.

No one wants to see that or any other undeserving scenario of someone losing a home, my heart goes out to anyone going through it. Though it was many years ago, I can say been there, done that.

Pileofmoney The idea of a rescue bill sounds great until you consider the following; the “Emergency Foreclosure Rescue Bill” represents at least 10% of the entire 3.1 Trillion dollar government budget, in total the bill represents almost as much money as we have spent in Iraq the last 4 years. However, it is important to note the bill is not in the 2008 budget, it is extra spending not originally budgeted for.

At least with Iraq I understand why we are there, we went in to search for WMD, to fight Islamic Jihadist’s on their own turf, to free Shiite’s, Sunni’s and Christians from a Bathist tyrant, to provide a buffer between Iran and Israel, etc. Whether anyone agrees with the war in Iraq on or not, now that the troops are over there, most reasonable people understand supporting the troops and budgeting for it.

But the mortgage foreclosure bail out, I don’t get it.

Richardson_sworn_in Are we supposed to bail out people like California Congresswoman Laura Richardson who was approved for a $535,000.00 home loan to buy a second home in Sacramento while already owning a home in Long Beach valued at $474,000.00 while her yearly income was $169,000.00 and she owed $8,000.00 in property taxes. Richardson’s second home was eventually put up for auction but I still want to know, why are we being asked to bail out people like Congresswoman Richardson when she should never have received approval for a loan in the first place, the concept is ridiculous.

Why are we being asked to bail out the mortgage loans of young people who never really had the credit history and cash down payment needed to get a home loan that was truly structured to meet their income level, why are we being asked to bail out amateur business people who over-purchased flip houses and could not afford the carrying costs when their investments did not sell, why are we being asked to bail out people who never had a home inspection prior to purchase, never spoke with an attorney prior to purchase, never reviewed the truth in lending laws or who under-insured their homes and are now having buyer’s remorse due to some issue with the home, and last but not least, why are we being asked to bail out unscrupulous mortgage lenders who “double teamed” home buyers by convincing borrowers that two loans was better than one and both of them were full of ridiculous hidden interest rates and penalties… bailing any of those people out, be they borrower or lender doesn’t pass the smell test.

Dodd_fairfield Why are we preparing to bail them out... because many current and former legislators are wallet deep in the middle of the mortgage mess that is why. Many of them like former Presidential candidate, Democrat Senator Christopher Dodd, who is also chairman of the Banking Committee, and Democrat Senator Kent Conrad, who is also chairman of the Budget Committee and a member of the Finance Committee, refinanced properties through “V.I.P.” sweetheart deals.

Others deep in the mortgage mess include former U.N. Ambassador and Assistant Secretary of State under Bill Clinton, Richard Holbrooke, former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under George W. Bush, Alphonso Jackson, former Secretary of Health and Human Services under Bill Clinton, Donna Shalala, and Jim Johnson a long time Democrat Washington insider who was Walter Mondale’s campaign Manager, a member of John Kerry’s Vice Presidential selection committee and was appointed to help lead Barack Obama’s Vice Presidential selection committee until he recently resigned.

Abc_johnson_obama_080611_mn Each of them received “V.I.P” sweetheart deals from big mortgage lenders, and still more have enjoyed all expenses paid junkets with lobbyists, received campaign contributions from mortgage lenders who are in trouble, or are bleeding heart liberals that believe using our hard earned tax dollars as “income redistribution” is the “fair” way to rescue borrowers and lenders from mortgage loan defaults.

I wished life were fair. If I had my “druthers” I would settle for my current 3/2/2 home being paid for, being debt free, having six to twelve months worth of expenses in the bank and a few hundred thousand in a retirement account when I turn 65.

Right now I would settle for a few less legislators using Marxist “income redistribution” policies to give our hard earned tax dollars to their buddies in the mortgage business, their former legislative colleagues who are now lobbyists, or their constituents who are in debt up to their eye balls by their own hand.

I wished no one ever lost their home, as I said earlier the experience is very traumatic but it is a risk that all home buyers and all mortgage lenders take. For the most desperate cases there are already arbitration and other legal and financial remedies available to the borrower and the lender, there is no reason for this bill to be in debate at this time.

Gaspricesup The mortgage situation is bad enough without the corrupt, the liberal, the brain dead and the dumb in Washington coming together from all four corners to “fix” another problem that the free market can settle on its own.

Heck, if we weren’t all paying $4.25 a gallon for gas and milk maybe more people could pay their mortgage on time.

If legislators really wanted to help “fix” the mortgage loan problem they can start by helping Americans keep more of our hard earned money and lower our taxes so we can save, invest and spend more and stimulate the economy.

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What’s the Most Important Issue in America? It’s Energy Independence, STUPID!

Originally published on www.barnhartblog.com  Capitol_dc

 When in the blue blazes is Congress going to get it…the most important issue this election year is not the Iraq war, global warming, universal healthcare, abortion, or any other typically liberal cause-celeb, it is energy independence, PERIOD!

It impacts our ability to provide a strong national defense, it impacts the ability of every company large and small to do business in a cost effective manner, it impacts the price of every good and service, and it impacts the ability of Americans to save, invest, spend, and just get back and forth.

Fossilfuel_2 Like it or not this country and the rest of the earth is completely dependent on oil, petroleum, natural gas, coal and other fossil fuels. We use fossil fuels in the production of plastics, masonry, synthetic fibers, lubricants, solvents, medicines, health and beauty products, they help heat our homes and power the vast majority of our vehicles.

Unless you live in a cave, bare naked with no modern tools it is literally impossible to eat, drink, sleep, work or take a dump anywhere in the civilized world without being touched by oil or fossil fuel products directly or indirectly in some way.

Liberal_boy So when I hear liberal politicians, actors, activists, and other “progressive voices” say “yes we can” to getting rid of oil, petroleum, coal, natural gas and the use of other fossil fuels I wonder what planet they are from and what drug they are on.

Anyone who says “yes we can” to the elimination of the worlds dependence on oil and other fossil fuels is not blind, they are not ignorant, they are not uninformed, they are 1000% OUT of TOUCH, CRAZY, DUMB and STUPID!

They should be permanently blindfolded, gagged, put in a straight jacket and tossed into a deep dark hole never to be seen or heard from again.

Old_hippie_very_old_hippies_1 Anyone who says “yes we can” rid ourselves of the use of oil and other fossil fuels is a waste of space and are sucking up the oxygen the rest of the sane people in the world need to live and use to power our brains.

Almost as ridiculous are those who say “no we can’t” to opening up more areas for the exploration of oil and other fossil fuels because it won’t pay off for ten years, it might hurt polar bears, it might damage the environment, yada, yada.

They are the same people that 40 years ago started smoking dope, injecting heroin and taking LSD on a daily basis to “open their minds”, “expand their consciousness” and “free themselves from the shackles of institutional repression.”

They tuned in, turned on, dropped out and became totally brain dead. To this day many of them still live in a psychedelicfantasy world of cellophane rainbows, unicorns and fairies, so why anyone listens to and believes their unrealistic horse manure is beyond me. At the present time we cannot eliminate the world’s need for oil and other fossil fuels any more than a person could catch a fart and paint it purple.

Well380 What we can and should do is explore, drill, and refine the oil and other fossil fuels available to us in the United States while we also expand the use and reduce the cost of other energy sources.

We MUST increase the supply to meet the demand in our own country. If we want to be more secure we need to put ourselves in a position to where we no longer need to constantly suckle at the breast of foreign governments who could yank the nipple from our mouths without warning.

My wife and I recently took a trip thru several central Texas towns with a long history of oil production, the majority of the pumping stations were active, but some were not and there is no excuse for it. There are millions of acres of land that oil companies have access to where they can explore and drill, they should be doing it.

AnwrCongressional leaders also need to open up areas like ANWR, the US coastline, the Rockies, and Montana for exploration. Ten years ago Bill Clinton eliminated oil leases in more than thirty five locations around the US, using the argument that it takes ten years to obtain oil and fossil fuels from an explored area we would have billions more barrels of oil available to us right now than we do. By the way, many engineers and executives involved in the energy business have tried to dispel the rumor that it takes 10 years to get oil to the market. The reality is that in some cases it would take less than 12 months, some 3 years, 5 years and other 10 or 12 years. It depends greatly on the location, the source, the extraction and refining methods.

We are presently the number 3 producer of oil and fossil fuels in the world, and we have more than enough oil and fossil fuels available to us to be energy independent for several centuries. There is no excuse for the current cost of oil, gas, food, and other items in the US, we have the ability to positively influence our economy and the value of the dollar and we should be doing it.

That said, we cannot drill our way out of our dependence on oil and fossil fuels but we also cannot tax our way out of it either.

Technology exists that is better and more efficient than using gasoline based combustion engines and we must increase our development of them if we want to reduce their cost and once again be the innovative industrial powerhouse we were during the last 100 years.

We must encourage the research and development of biological renewable crude oil by companies like LS9. See link - http://www.ls9.com

Biofuel We must encourage the research and development of synthetic fuels, sugar cane and hemp bio-fuels, we must develop wind, hydro-electric, nuclear and solar power plants where we can. We should expand the production of electric and hydrogen powered and hybrid vehicles and retrofit parts so they are less expensive and more affordable.

Increased taxes on “big oil” will only raise the cost for consumers, and reducing the demand for oil and fossil fuels does not reduce the price because they are used in too many products. In fact, the demand for oil and gas has gone down in the US over the last year by 1% to 2% and prices have greatly increased, and that is because the supply is too low. As long as the supply is low hedge fund speculators will continue to put up 10% of the cash needed to buy oil futures from each other, oil companies will continue to raise their prices, and the artificial market will continue to exist putting our economy in danger of crashing.

520statueflag Blame who you want for the current predicament we find ourselves in, as I have said before there is more than enough blame to go around, but if your neighbor, friend, local, state, federal legislator or presidential candidate does not grasp the concept of why it is so important for our country to be 100% energy independent send them a copy of my Blog and let me help you tell them…the most important issue facing America today…It’s Energy Independence, STUPID!

Technorati LinksView CC licenseSubscribe to this feedSphere: Related ContentAdd to del.icio.usShare on Facebookoutside.in: geotag this story Discuss on NewsvineStumble It!Add to Mixx!Digg This!Save to del.icio.usEmail this

Posted by John Barnhart on June 21, 2008 at 03:37 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) ShareThis

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »